Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Cable News Clips
Related: About this forumTim Kaine Begins Senate War Powers Debate After Trump Said He'd Consider Bombing Iran Again - Forbes Breaking News
Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) initiated debate on a war powers resolution requiring Trump to seek Congressional approval before striking Iran. - 06/27/2025.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Tim Kaine Begins Senate War Powers Debate After Trump Said He'd Consider Bombing Iran Again - Forbes Breaking News (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Jun 27
OP
If everything was completely Obliterated, what would be the point of bombing again?
Wiz Imp
Jun 27
#1
Maddow Blog-Senate rejects War Powers Act measure on Trump, additional military strikes on Iran
LetMyPeopleVote
Jun 28
#4
Wiz Imp
(6,151 posts)1. If everything was completely Obliterated, what would be the point of bombing again?
He's so stupid, he doesn't even realize that by saying this, it confirms that the "completely obliterated" claim is total bullshit.
BOSSHOG
(43,371 posts)2. How the hell is he going to win the Nobel Prize
If he stops bombing the hell out of sovereign nations?
And if he has to continue to bomb then isnt his original hypothesis wrong?
Rhiannon12866
(239,291 posts)3. Apparently in his addled mind "War is Peace..."



LetMyPeopleVote
(166,618 posts)4. Maddow Blog-Senate rejects War Powers Act measure on Trump, additional military strikes on Iran
Senators missed an opportunity to apply some checks and balances on a White House that needs to be checked and balanced.
On Kaineâs War Powers Act resolution, Senate Republicans (plus Fetterman, minus Paul) rejected an opportunity to apply some checks and balances on a White House that needs to be checked and balanced. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-06-27T23:46:18.427Z
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/senate-rejects-war-powers-act-measure-trump-iran-strike-rcna215634
Ahead of the offensive, Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia introduced a war powers resolution designed to limit the use of the U.S. armed forces against Iran without congressional approval.
Six days after the airstrikes, the Senate took up the measure privileged resolutions reach the floor, whether the majoritys leadership likes it or not and it was not subject to the 60-vote filibuster rule. In other words, all Kaines proposal needed was a simple majority.
He didnt get one.
The 53-47 vote opposing the resolution fell mostly on party lines with Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as the only senators to break with their own sides.
At this point, the effort might appear moot. After all, the strikes already happened, and the White House has already effectively declared mission accomplished.....
Whats more, despite the recent chatter about Saturdays mission being a one-and-done operation, the president himself continues to make clear that hes prepared to launch additional strikes as he and he alone sees fit.
Ahead of the vote, The New Republics Greg Sargent argued that if the Senate rejected the resolution, it would only embolden Trump at a time when he is clearly growing more unhinged, power-crazed, and deaf to outside voices. Hours later, senators missed an opportunity to apply some checks and balances on a White House that needs to be checked and balanced.
Six days after the airstrikes, the Senate took up the measure privileged resolutions reach the floor, whether the majoritys leadership likes it or not and it was not subject to the 60-vote filibuster rule. In other words, all Kaines proposal needed was a simple majority.
He didnt get one.
The 53-47 vote opposing the resolution fell mostly on party lines with Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as the only senators to break with their own sides.
At this point, the effort might appear moot. After all, the strikes already happened, and the White House has already effectively declared mission accomplished.....
Whats more, despite the recent chatter about Saturdays mission being a one-and-done operation, the president himself continues to make clear that hes prepared to launch additional strikes as he and he alone sees fit.
Ahead of the vote, The New Republics Greg Sargent argued that if the Senate rejected the resolution, it would only embolden Trump at a time when he is clearly growing more unhinged, power-crazed, and deaf to outside voices. Hours later, senators missed an opportunity to apply some checks and balances on a White House that needs to be checked and balanced.