Science
Related: About this forumMapping risks of water injustice and perceptions of privatized drinking water in the United States: A mixed methods appr
Alex Segrè Cohen, Catherine E. Slavik, Sami Kurani, Joseph Árvai
First published: 15 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70012
Abstract
About 2 million people in the United States do not have access to running water or indoor plumbing in their homes. In addition, 30 million more Americans live where water systems operate unsafely. More still could have access to clean and safe drinking water but cannot afford to pay for it. Water privatization has been proposed as both a solution to and an exacerbator of these challenges, but its potential consequences have not been investigated on a national scale. Data from the US Environmental Protection Agency's Safe Drinking Water Information System and the US Center for Disease Control's Environmental Justice Index were used to assess the spatial distribution of water injustice hotspots, water system violations, and water system ownership. These data were merged with a nationally representative survey of US residents that measured how people perceive their water across different water injustice indicators. Results indicated that water system violations were not randomly distributed across the United States and risks of exposure to water injustice appeared to cluster in certain locations as hotspots. Clusters of water system violations were spatially associated with private water system ownership. Hotspots of water injustice were more often surrounded by counties with low proportions of privately owned water systems than counties with high proportions. Results also suggested that individuals living in areas with higher water injustice perceived their water as lower quality and less reliable. Water system ownership moderated this relationship. Recommendations for policymakers are discussed, including how to build collaborative decision-making processes that account for both objective and subjective measures of water injustice.
Snip...more
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/risa.70012
❤️pants

GiqueCee
(2,139 posts)... cannot possibly have any benefits, save those accrued by the exploiters controlling said resource. Privatization of any resource or essential service to enrich a few at the expense of the many, is promoted by diseased entities masquerading as humans that are consumed by insatiable greed and malice.
Note to corporatists: "Corporatism" is what Mussolini preferred to call his form of government. Subscribing to anything spewed from the gaping maw of Elon Musk, but particularly his embrace of fascism, indelibly brands you as irredeemable sociopaths that deserve to share Mussolini's fate.
TommyT139
(1,258 posts)...but selling groundwater to foreign countries, so there's even less of the already paltry control or oversight possible.
With Trump's promises to sell off natural resources even from parks and preserves, this will only speed up.
Edited to add example - just one case.
Background from April 2023:
Saudi company draws unlimited Arizona ground water to grow alfalfa amid drought
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/saudi-company-fondomonte-arizona-ground-water-crop-alfalfa/
Latest (several days ago):
Saudi-owned farm denies legal liability for damage caused by groundwater use
https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2025/04/14/saudi-owned-farm-denies-legal-liability-for-damage-caused-by-groundwater-use/
Especially when that ground water is in arid Arizona where Saudis are extracting far more than their agreed-upon share.
I don't have numbers right in front of me, but I'm sure they're squirreled away somewhere. AH! I see you've already found it.
And when, oh WHEN, are people going to acknowledge the Bear fucking the Elephant in the room? EVERYTHING Trump and Musk are doing is in service to Putin. Musk's pimple-faced minions are even providing the Russians with direct links to sensitive data in agencies they're raping.
That. Is. TREASON! And Republicans are fine with it! Defenestrate 'em ALL!