Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumTide pods and a few other brands are locked in a box. Why?...
Link to tweet
Tide pods and a few other brands are locked in a box. Why? Because a few idiots ate them in a challenge and got sick or died. This is the answer to that. Now what about mass shooting murders? Why is it hard to lawmakers to find a solution?
#NeverAgain

					
						10 replies
						
							 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				
				 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				
						Tide pods and a few other brands are locked in a box. Why?... (Original Post)
						ffr
						Mar 2018
						OP
					
      
      
      
        
        I know, good huh, straightforward and effective.  Congress acted on that in a bipartisan way.
        ffr
        Mar 2018
        #2
      
      
      
        
        Are you really claiming Congress passed laws to require that laundry pods be secured?
        WhiskeyGrinder
        Mar 2018
        #4
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
        
        Took 'em only a few hours to make sure no more dogs die in overheads, too...
        TreasonousBastard
        Mar 2018
        #3
      
      
      
      
krispos42
(49,445 posts)1. Really?  This is your analogy?
        If you really can't answer this question then I can't help you.
ffr
(23,298 posts)2. I know, good huh, straightforward and effective.  Congress acted on that in a bipartisan way.
        And that was only for a few people getting sick or dying.  

WhiskeyGrinder
(25,915 posts)4. Are you really claiming Congress passed laws to require that laundry pods be secured?
        discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,692 posts)6. I'd say no he's not
        Be careful, there may be a straw man waiting for you.  
   
  
 
   
   
 
WhiskeyGrinder
(25,915 posts)7. I know, I like to just spell it out.
         
 discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,692 posts)9. I applaud spelling it out.
         Pointing and laughing is fine, too.
  Pointing and laughing is fine, too.  
 WhiskeyGrinder
(25,915 posts)10. That's the next step!
        krispos42
(49,445 posts)8. It's stupid as fuck
        And so is your graphic.

TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)3. Took 'em only a few hours to make sure no more dogs die in overheads, too...
        But these are the easy ones.
Sailor65x1
(554 posts)5. You might want to reconsider sharing this one
        The lock boxes are in place to deter theft, nothing more. Although the challenge did increase theft of individual pods in stores, many stores in higher theft areas were securing these long before this challenge thing started. Stores that started locking them up after the challenge did so because of the theft increase; not to stop the eating of them.


