Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumHe Burned a Flag and Won an American Right. He Worries It's at Risk.
He Burned a Flag and Won an American Right. He Worries Its at Risk.
The Supreme Court ruled in 1989 that burning an American flag is speech protected by the First Amendment. President Trump says it should be punished.

Gregory Johnson displayed a flag he has used in protests, in Venice, Calif., in 2021. Mr. Johnson won a landmark Supreme Court case in 1989 protecting political expression that is now being challenged by President Trump. Jenna Schoenefeld for The New York Times
By Adam Liptak
Reporting from Washington
Sept. 1, 2025, 5:03 a.m. ET
In the summer of 1984, at the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Gregory Johnson burned an American flag to protest the policies of President Ronald Reagan.
It was a way to speak to the people of the world, Mr. Johnson said last week, a few days after President Trump issued an executive order that sought to undermine his landmark Supreme Court victory, Texas v. Johnson. By a 5-to-4 vote in 1989, the court said Mr. Johnsons burning of the flag was political expression protected by the First Amendment.
Mr. Johnson, now 68, said protests like the one in Dallas were even more urgent in the Trump era. Do you want to live in a country, he asked, thats based on coerced, forced, compulsory patriotism?
Mr. Trumps order urged prosecution of flag burnings to the fullest extent permissible by invoking laws not aimed at speech, and it instructed officials to pursue deportation of noncitizens who burn American flags. The order only indirectly challenged the 1989 ruling, however, telling the attorney general to pursue litigation to clarify the scope of the First Amendment exceptions.
Mr. Johnson said he had not planned to burn a flag in Dallas. But when someone handed him one, he said, it seemed fitting. That flag, he said, is a symbol of American empire and plunder and murder going back to slavery in this country, and 100 years of Jim Crow segregation and all the lynching and the theft of half of Mexico.
{snip}

Mr. Johnson at Revolution Books in Berkeley, Calif., last month. Mark Davis for The New York Times
{snip}

The Supreme Court justices Stephen Breyer and Antonin Scalia testifying at a Senate hearing in 2011. Stephen Crowley/The New York Times
{snip}
Adam Liptak covers the Supreme Court and writes Sidebar, a column on legal developments. A graduate of Yale Law School, he practiced law for 14 years before joining The Times in 2002.
The Supreme Court ruled in 1989 that burning an American flag is speech protected by the First Amendment. President Trump says it should be punished.

Gregory Johnson displayed a flag he has used in protests, in Venice, Calif., in 2021. Mr. Johnson won a landmark Supreme Court case in 1989 protecting political expression that is now being challenged by President Trump. Jenna Schoenefeld for The New York Times
By Adam Liptak
Reporting from Washington
Sept. 1, 2025, 5:03 a.m. ET
In the summer of 1984, at the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Gregory Johnson burned an American flag to protest the policies of President Ronald Reagan.
It was a way to speak to the people of the world, Mr. Johnson said last week, a few days after President Trump issued an executive order that sought to undermine his landmark Supreme Court victory, Texas v. Johnson. By a 5-to-4 vote in 1989, the court said Mr. Johnsons burning of the flag was political expression protected by the First Amendment.
Mr. Johnson, now 68, said protests like the one in Dallas were even more urgent in the Trump era. Do you want to live in a country, he asked, thats based on coerced, forced, compulsory patriotism?
Mr. Trumps order urged prosecution of flag burnings to the fullest extent permissible by invoking laws not aimed at speech, and it instructed officials to pursue deportation of noncitizens who burn American flags. The order only indirectly challenged the 1989 ruling, however, telling the attorney general to pursue litigation to clarify the scope of the First Amendment exceptions.
Mr. Johnson said he had not planned to burn a flag in Dallas. But when someone handed him one, he said, it seemed fitting. That flag, he said, is a symbol of American empire and plunder and murder going back to slavery in this country, and 100 years of Jim Crow segregation and all the lynching and the theft of half of Mexico.
{snip}

Mr. Johnson at Revolution Books in Berkeley, Calif., last month. Mark Davis for The New York Times
{snip}

The Supreme Court justices Stephen Breyer and Antonin Scalia testifying at a Senate hearing in 2011. Stephen Crowley/The New York Times
{snip}
Adam Liptak covers the Supreme Court and writes Sidebar, a column on legal developments. A graduate of Yale Law School, he practiced law for 14 years before joining The Times in 2002.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

He Burned a Flag and Won an American Right. He Worries It's at Risk. (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Monday
OP
CrispyQ
(40,195 posts)1. So....money equals speech but burning a flag isn't free speech?
So fucking crazy.
lapfog_1
(31,237 posts)2. yet again West Wing has something to say about this...
"Did you go to Law School?"
"No, Clown School!"
mahatmakanejeeves
(66,582 posts)3. That was great. Thanks. Have a great Labor Day. NT