Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
"Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error ..."
Kevin M. Kruse
@kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Follow
It's fun when judges pretend to be historians, isn't it?
Mark Joseph Stern
@mjsdc.bsky.social
· 1h
Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5378193
August 5, 2025 at 10:33 AM
@kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Follow
It's fun when judges pretend to be historians, isn't it?
Mark Joseph Stern
@mjsdc.bsky.social
· 1h
Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5378193
August 5, 2025 at 10:33 AM
It's fun when judges pretend to be historians, isn't it?
— Kevin M. Kruse (@kevinmkruse.bsky.social) 2025-08-05T14:33:59.168Z
Mark Joseph Stern
@mjsdc.bsky.social
Follow
Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5378193
August 5, 2025 at 10:12 AM
@mjsdc.bsky.social
Follow
Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5378193
August 5, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjsdc.bsky.social) 2025-08-05T14:12:55.159Z
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
