Foreign Affairs
Related: About this forumChinese suppliers are offering U.S. Amazon sellers a tariff solution--but it's not legal
Source: Fortune
Exclusive: Chinese suppliers are offering U.S. Amazon sellers a tariff solutionbut its not legal
Jason Del Rey
Sat, April 12, 2025 at 2:04 PM EDT 3 min read
President Trump's China tariffs are not just roiling the operations of Amazon sellers and other U.S. retailers big and small. They're also upending the businesses of Chinese manufacturers and distributors supplying goods to the U.S. from the other side of the world.
Now, some of these suppliers are trying to keep their businesses humming by offering a simplebut illegalsolution to U.S. Amazon sellers: lying about the value of the Amazon merchandise you are importing to the U.S. in an effort to lower the duties you'll have to pay under the new slate of tariffs.
Yes, that sounds a lot like customs fraud.
In emails and WeChat messages viewed by Fortune, around a half dozen Chinese suppliers proposed such illegal workarounds to executives from a mid-sized household goods brand with a large presence on Amazon.
-snip-
Read more: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-chinese-suppliers-offering-u-180458865.html

MichMan
(14,927 posts)They steal intellectual property, copy patented and trademarked products to create counterfeits, and fail to abide by WTO guidelines. What else would you expect?
taxi
(2,161 posts)If the amount paid is the invoiced amount and the tariff, and that total is the same amount as what the product was previously sold for, how is that avoiding the tariff? What is does is reduce the amount of tariff collected - effectively causing the tariffs collected to be less than what was budgeted for. That by itself forces the projected income from the tariff to be missed.
MichMan
(14,927 posts)Wouldn't what you are saying mean that it is the people here, those importing and falsely reporting the value of the goods, that are the ones doing the cheating?
MichMan
(14,927 posts)Those who are providing fraudulent documentation to facilite it are just as guilty as those using them.
taxi
(2,161 posts)Why do you think they, the both of them, both sides, have had to resort to this unlawful scheme?