Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,754 posts)
Sat Jun 13, 2026, 11:28 AM 5 hrs ago

The Use of Human Based Organoids in Toxicology Testing.

The paper to which I'll briefly refer in this post is this one: Bridging Toxicological Silos with Organoids: A Systems Approach to Human-Relevant Risk Assessment Na Zhao, Xiaojun Deng, Rui Dong, and Yanbin Zhao Environmental Science & Technology 2026 60 (13), 9831-9842.

I have worked in the pharmaceutical industry my entire adult life, and although I don't eat mammals and birds, I am aware that mammals in particular, have experienced great cruelty in the development of drugs which save human lives. It's a sad but necessary compromise in my view; others are free to disagree on this weakly moral position.

The science of molecular biology has been built, in part, on the lives of lab animals, but now that we live in its golden age, it may present a way out of the moral conundrum of its origins. To wit: It is now possible to culture most human tissue.

The toxicology of pollution, everything from cigarette smoke to the poisoned air we accept, major killers, had depended on animal testing.

Thus this article, for which I will not have much time to discuss, is encouraging, a path out.

From the introduction:

Environmental contaminants, ranging from persistent organic pollutants (POPs) to emerging chemicals of concern, continue to pose escalating risks to human health and ecosystems. Yet our capacity to evaluate their toxic potential remains constrained by fragmented and siloed testing systems. Traditional toxicology still relies heavily on animal models such as mice and zebrafish, as well as some in vitro assays such as two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures. These approaches, while historically foundational, often fail to recapitulate the complexity of human biology and therefore provide limited predictive value. (1) Meanwhile, regulatory momentum is shifting. The European Union has reaffirmed its commitment to reducing animal testing, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has begun phasing out mammalian testing for chemical safety evaluations. (2,3) These policy shifts, therefore, highlight the urgent need for integrated, human-relevant, and mechanistically informative models in toxicology.

Innovative three-dimensional (3D) culture systems, including organoids, spheroids, and matrix-embedded cultures, represent an important step beyond conventional cell systems by better simulating the architecture and physiology of human tissues. (4) Among these, organoids have emerged as a transformative technology in both biomedical and environmental research. (5) Derived from pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), adult stem cells (ASCs), or primary patient samples, organoids self-organize into 3D structures that preserve organ-specific architecture, cellular heterogeneity, and functional activity. (6,7) Importantly, the cellular origin of an organoid fundamentally influences its toxicological relevance. PSC-derived organoids, generated from embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells, (8) are especially powerful for modeling early developmental processes, lineage specification, and organogenesis. These features make them particularly suited for the studies of developmental and life-course toxicity. (9,10) However, PSC-based organoids often exhibit immature, fetal-like phenotypes, incompletely developed xenobiotic metabolism and transporter functions, and limited preservation of donor-specific epigenetic states. (11) As a result, their ability to model chronic, low-dose, or age-dependent exposures remains constrained. In contrast, ASC-derived organoids more faithfully preserve tissue-specific differentiation programs, mature metabolic capacity, donor-associated epigenetic and transcriptional landscapes, and currently represent the most widely adopted platforms in translational toxicology and disease modeling. (12) These attributes make ASC-derived organoids well suited for toxicological questions centered on adult organ function, including gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, and endocrine responses to sustained exposures...


Some graphics:

A graphic on the history of organoid development:



The caption:

Figure 1. Timeline of organoid generation and their comparative functional advantages. (A) Schematic representation of the generation timeline for different types of organoids. (B) Comparison of 2D cell cultures, organoids, and animal models in environmental toxicology applications.




The caption:

Figure 2. Organoid applications bridge mechanistic, causal, and personalized insights in environmental toxicology. Organoids recapitulate tissue architecture and cellular interactions, enabling mechanistic studies of differentiation and developmental toxicity inaccessible in 2D cultures or animal models. Under controlled exposures, they link molecular perturbations to tissue- and organ-level outcomes, supporting causal inference and facilitating personalized assessments of susceptibility to environmental pollutants.




The caption:

Figure 3. Emerging next-generation strategies in organoid-based environmental toxicology. Three complementary approaches are highlighted: Interconnected and vascularized organoid systems that integrate multiple organ types, vascularization, and cocultures with immune or microbial components to better recapitulate human physiology and interorgan interactions; Integration with single-cell omics analyses enables high-resolution mapping of pollutant-induced perturbations across diverse cell populations, pathways, and regulatory networks; and high-throughput organoid platforms, integrating automated imaging and AI-driven analytics for scalable screening, mechanistic discovery, and predictive toxicology.


Side note: The mass spectrometer in the diagram is an Orbitrap, a kind of minicyclotron. In theory they are great instruments, but in practice, kind of a horror story. I never meet anyone in the field who is happy about the service and support. If you're a scientist thinking of investing in one because you have big bucks in your budget, buy a TOF instrument from Waters or Bruker, or if you must have a cyclotron based instrument and can find the helium to keep it going, consider a Bruker FT-ICR instrument. At least in this area, the Thermo corporation sucks.

Anyway, this article is promising.

Another aside:

I am impressed that Chinese scientists, now that the United States has remarkably committed scientific and moral suicide to worship an orange ignorant pedophile, have active scientific programs that seem guided by an ethical stature. They do not live in a Democracy, regrettably, but apparently their leaders, for what its worth, although they are dictators are at least not ignorant dictators with no regard for the future of humanity. Their faults well know, they are better than we are.

Right now Chinese scientists are filling our best scientific journals. I'm an atheist, but will nonetheless say, "Bless them."
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Use of Human Based Or...