Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(64,003 posts)
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 07:11 AM 10 hrs ago

At Current CO2 Output, NJ Facing Between 2.2 And 3.8 Feet Of Sea-Level Rise By 2100; W. Ice Sheet Loss, 4.5 Feet

New Jersey is likely to see between 2.2 and 3.8 feet of sea-level rise by 2100 if the current level of global carbon emissions continue, but seas could rise by as much as 4.5 feet if ice-sheet melt accelerates, the New Jersey Climate Change Resource Center at Rutgers University said on Tuesday. In the third report since 2016 by the center’s Science and Technical Advisory Panel, scientists at Rutgers and beyond said human-caused climate change is accelerating sea-level rise in New Jersey, and flood hazards are “rapidly increasing” along the state’s coast, as well as in communities near tidal rivers, marshes and wetlands.

The 155-page document, commissioned by the state’s Department of Environmental Protection, and inviting input from 144 scientists, set out to identify, evaluate and summarize the most recent science on sea-level rise and changing coastal storms, but avoided any policy prescriptions that might protect the densely populated and low-lying northeastern U.S. state.

EDIT

The last report by the Science and Technical Advisory Panel in 2019 predicted that an intermediate emissions scenario would likely lead to sea-level rise of 2 feet by 2100—0.2 feet lower than in the new report. Other updates include fresh emissions scenarios, detailed forecasts for sea-level rise rates, flooding frequencies for multiple locations and a summary of the impacts of sea-level rise and coastal storms.

EDIT

Robert Kopp, a Rutgers climate scientist who led the study, said the current level of emissions matches an “intermediate” scenario, under which the New Jersey sea level at Atlantic City would rise between 2.2 and 3.8 feet by the end of the century, excluding the possible effects of ice-sheet loss in Greenland and Antarctica, a phenomenon that isn’t yet well understood. If ice loss is included, seas are likely to rise by 4.5 feet, the study found. “Current emissions that would be consistent with our intermediate emissions scenario get you to around 2.7 degrees [Celsius] by the end of the century,” said Kopp, a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, during a webinar to launch the report.

EDIT

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/19112025/new-jersey-sea-level-rise-coastal-flooding/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At Current CO2 Output, NJ Facing Between 2.2 And 3.8 Feet Of Sea-Level Rise By 2100; W. Ice Sheet Loss, 4.5 Feet (Original Post) hatrack 10 hrs ago OP
I've had the pleasure of seeing Dr. Kopp speak and corresponded with him once. NNadir 9 hrs ago #1
you know it sue4e3 6 hrs ago #2

NNadir

(36,954 posts)
1. I've had the pleasure of seeing Dr. Kopp speak and corresponded with him once.
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 08:46 AM
9 hrs ago

He explained in the correspondence the effect of land use changes in CO2 release data as well as the effect of mining groundwater on sea level rise.

It's interesting that NJ shore towns, those that will be inundated, can be characterized, as I sometimes do, as "Oklahoma by the sea." NJ is a solidly blue state overall, but the Jersey shore is redneck heaven where Trump flags, stickers and other idiotic cult junk abounds.

sue4e3

(754 posts)
2. you know it
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 11:30 AM
6 hrs ago

My property will be bay front property at that point and one of the things that baffles me is how idiotic these trump humpers are that continue to vote to kill themselves and their off spring. I guess it shouldn't. If you've ever had a conversation with one, it really shouldn't

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»At Current CO2 Output, NJ...