Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(63,648 posts)
Thu Oct 2, 2025, 07:09 AM 20 hrs ago

Former NOAA Employees Launch Climate.us To Provide Data Scrubbed By Trump; AGU, AMS Reboot National Climate Assessment

Ed. - And if you contribute to climate.us, they're running a one-for-one match for all contributions up to $10,000. Just saying . . .

Researchers across the United States and the world who raced to protect climate data, public reports and other information from the Trump administration’s budget cuts, firings and scrubbing of federal websites are launching their own climate information portals. A group of scientists and other experts who formerly worked for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration recently launched climate.us, where they eventually hope to replicate much of the public-oriented climate content from climate.gov.

In a parallel effort, two major scientific institutions, the American Geophysical Union and the American Meteorological Society, have started soliciting studies for a special “Climate Collection” to maintain momentum on the work that was already under way on a Congressionally mandated 6th National Climate Assessment, due in 2028, before all the scientists working on the report were fired and cabinet-level team that led the effort disbanded.

The new efforts demonstrate how difficult it is to erase or obscure climate science from the public in an era when thousands of scientists and computers around the world are continuously calculating and measuring climate and greenhouse gas emissions. Other science rescue efforts have focused on preserving those data sets, but the public-facing portals are also important, experts said.

Current efforts by the U.S. government to make it harder for people to get scientific information are a clear-cut case of censorship, said Haley Crim, currently a climate solutions researcher at MIT and one of the leaders of an effort to restore important climate information that officials in the Trump administration purged from federal websites. Along with significant funding and personnel cuts to various federal climate programs and other scientific efforts, some scientists report facing increased harassment and threats online. Others worry that misleading, inaccurate and potentially dangerous misinformation is being posted on official government websites.

EDIT

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/01102025/climate-science-available-online/

https://www.climate.us/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former NOAA Employees Launch Climate.us To Provide Data Scrubbed By Trump; AGU, AMS Reboot National Climate Assessment (Original Post) hatrack 20 hrs ago OP
Heroes!!!! SheltieLover 20 hrs ago #1
K & R...... Lovie777 20 hrs ago #2
We need to do this in the west and start a private CDC ... diverdownjt 18 hrs ago #3
I am extremely worried about the loss of data and instrumentation. NNadir 18 hrs ago #4
I'm extremely worried about multigraincracker 17 hrs ago #5
If it doesn't have the scientific methodology, it is just opinion and anecdotal. erronis 13 hrs ago #6
K & R yellow dahlia 4 hrs ago #7

diverdownjt

(735 posts)
3. We need to do this in the west and start a private CDC ...
Thu Oct 2, 2025, 09:02 AM
18 hrs ago

What ya think? Get a few Billionaires to fund it privately to keep the gov out of it.

NNadir

(36,660 posts)
4. I am extremely worried about the loss of data and instrumentation.
Thu Oct 2, 2025, 09:19 AM
18 hrs ago

Scientific fraud is a subset of the frauds with which these people are comfortable.

It is from my perspective however one which may have the most serious long term consequences. An example is Stalinist Lysenkoism, a nonsense concept, that lead long after Stalin died, to serious decline of Soviet agriculture in the 1970s. Lysenkoism's only support was political; there was no scientific support for it.

The issue with the climate is not localized geographically. It involves the entire planet.

One hopes that pockets of sanity will protect the data.

I've been concerned about the Mauna Loa Carbon Dioxide Observatory's integrity ever since the Orange Pedophile came back to the position of being able to asset his ignorance in the world conversation.

erronis

(21,449 posts)
6. If it doesn't have the scientific methodology, it is just opinion and anecdotal.
Thu Oct 2, 2025, 01:47 PM
13 hrs ago

A favorite tool of a bloviating bull-shit artist such as "many people tell me..."

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Former NOAA Employees Lau...