Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumJump In GHG Ouput Jan-Jun 2025 Puts US Well On The Road To Global 2C Outcome; Biden-Era Emissions Improvements Recede
A jump in greenhouse gas pollution in the US helped push global emissions higher in the first half of this year. This could be an omen of whats to come, with Donald Trumps pro-fossil fuel agenda set to significantly slow down the emissions cuts required to avoid disastrous climate impacts, a new forecast has found. The most abrupt shift in energy and climate policy in recent memory that has occurred since Trump re-entered the White House will have profound consequences for the global climate crisis by slowing the pace of US emissions cuts by as much as half the rate achieved over the past two decades, the Rhodium Group forecast states.
The US is still expected to reduce its planet-heat emissions by between 26% and 35% by 2035 compared with 2005 levels, according to the report. But this is well down from a 38% to 56% reduction by 2035, which Rhodium forecast just last year during Joe Bidens presidency. None of these scenarios will be sufficient to allow the US, the worlds largest historic emitter of carbon pollution, to play its full part in helping the world avert a worsening climate breakdown coming from 2C (3.6F) or more in global heating.
EDIT
The emissions impact of all of this will become obvious over the next couple of years, Rhodiums King said. A preview of this can be seen in the first six months of the year, during which US emissions rose by 1.4% compared with the same period last year, according to Climate Trace. This bump in emissions, aided by a similar rise in Brazil, ensured that global emissions were slightly higher than the first half of 2024, a stark sign of the task ahead for governments in tackling the climate crisis without the leadership of the US, the worlds second largest emitter.
We wont see the impacts of the Trump administration in the emissions data for a couple of years, I think, said King. But we are already seeing a slowdown in renewables installations and, to be honest, even a flatlining of emissions is a pretty bad indicator of the trajectory we need to be on.
EDIT/END
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/sep/10/us-greenhouse-gas-emissions

MrWowWow
(1,137 posts)And plans on deorbiting two critical climate monitoring satellites. What one cannot measure then is no longer an existential problem?
.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/05/climate/trump-climate-satellites.html
.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/17/climate/budget-cuts-climate-observatories.html
.
Note:
NOAA and the General Services Administration say theyre working to find suitable alternative space.". The NOAA lab on Hilo is where the CO2 monitoring flasks go for analysis. That building is or will soon be closed. The lease expired on August 31, 2025. The Mauna Loa Observatory is not slated to be closed. It is the actual site where atmospheric CO2 is manually measured.
At Mauna Loa Observatory, NOAA uses two main methods:
1. Continuous infrared analyzer (automated):
Air is drawn in through intake lines and passed into nondispersive infrared gas analyzers.
This gives real-time CO₂ readings, updated minute by minute.
These data are screened and corrected for calibration drift.
2. Flask sampling (manual handling):
Staff physically collect air in glass flasks on set schedules.
The flasks are then sent to a central lab (traditionally the Hilo office, now in question) for high-precision analysis by gas chromatography.
These manual measurements serve as the calibration backbone for the automated sensors, ensuring the long-term accuracy of the CO₂ record.
So: the famous Keeling Curve is based on automated instruments, but those instruments rely on manual flask measurements for quality control.
NNadir
(36,577 posts)...so called "renewable energy," as having something to do with arresting the accumulation of the dangerous fossil fuel waste carbon dioxide in the planetary atmosphere.
There is no evidence of this. Like sequestration & hydrogen, "renewable energy" is lipstick on the fossil fuel pig. So called "renewable energy" depends on access to fossil fuels.
The sole purpose of enthusiasm for "renewable energy" is to attack nuclear energy, the only viable tool for replacing fossil fuels. In this it has succeeded, which is why the rate of accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is accelerating rapidly.