Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumHuge "Game Changer" AI Data Farm In WY Will Use More Electricity Than All The State's Homes
An artificial intelligence data center that would use more electricity than every home in Wyoming combined before expanding to as much as five times that size will be built soon near Cheyenne, according to the citys mayor. Its a game changer. Its huge, Mayor Patrick Collins said Monday.
With cool weather good for keeping computer temperatures down and an abundance of inexpensive electricity from a top energy-producing state, Wyomings capital has become a hub of computing power. The city has been home to Microsoft data centers since 2012. An $800 million data center announced last year by Facebook parent company Meta Platforms is nearing completion, Collins said.
The latest data center, a joint effort between regional energy infrastructure company Tallgrass and AI data center developer Crusoe, would begin at 1.8 gigawatts of electricity and be scalable to 10 gigawatts, according to a joint company statement. A gigawatt can power as many as 1 million homes. But thats more homes than Wyoming has people. The least populated state, Wyoming, has about 590,000 people.
EDIT
Gov. Mark Gordon praised the projects value to the states gas industry. This is exciting news for Wyoming and for Wyoming natural gas producers, Gordon said in the statement. While data centers are energy-hungry, experts say companies can help reduce their effect on the climate by powering them with renewable energy rather than fossil fuels. Even so, electricity customers might see their bills increase as utilities plan for massive data projects on the grid.
EDIT
Yeah, a "game changer", all right. AI is like adding 10 or 12 zeroes to a roulette wheel that we're all playing, and that we're already adding two or three zeroes to every year. What a stupid fucking species we are.
https://apnews.com/article/ai-artificial-intelligence-data-center-electricity-wyoming-cheyenne-44da7974e2d942acd8bf003ebe2e855a

Demovictory9
(36,888 posts)highplainsdem
(57,601 posts)progree
(12,147 posts)If Wyoming has 2.4 people per household on average, then the 0.59 million population occupies 0.25 million homes.
And it says "a gigawatt can power as many as 1 million homes". I see similar metrics, basically 1 home = 1 KW average usage on a round-the-clock average basis.
So therefore, the state's 0.25 million homes uses 0.25 GW.
The data farm will initially use 1.8 GW of electricity, so that's 1.8/0.25 = 7.2 times what the state's homes use.
If it scales up from 1.8 GW to 10 GW, it will come to 40 times what the state's homes use.
It makes me feel like a silly dildo to be worrying about the environmental cost of the electricity I use, and suffering some inconvenience and time-consuming efforts and discomfort to reduce my electricity use, and then I see this crap where one data center initially uses 7.2 times what all the homes in Minneapolis proper plus a couple of its suburbs use (to put it in terms matching my location).
The article doesn't say anything about water usage. Data centers are a huge consumer of water (for cooling) from what I read.