Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

LiberalFighter

(53,544 posts) Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:35 AM Jun 2016

5

If the DNC used the GOP method it would be Clinton: 3,030 -- Sanders: 967

Where winner takes all.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If the DNC used the GOP method it would be Clinton: 3,030 -- Sanders: 967 (Original Post) LiberalFighter Jun 2016 OP

wow! Her Sister Jun 2016 #1

Exactly. Winner take all still_one Jun 2016 #2

She was the overwhelming choice of the people. teamster633 Jun 2016 #3

538-Nate (Silver) calculated an electoral map using the Dem primary results.. Princess Turandot Jun 2016 #4

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)

1. wow!

Reply to LiberalFighter (Original post)

Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:39 AM

Jun 2016

and yeap!

Our way was very good to Sanders!

still_one

(98,883 posts)

2. Exactly. Winner take all

Reply to LiberalFighter (Original post)

Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:42 AM

Jun 2016

teamster633

(2,032 posts)

3. She was the overwhelming choice of the people.

Reply to LiberalFighter (Original post)

Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:44 AM

Jun 2016

Despite the protests of all the whiners.

Princess Turandot

(4,893 posts)

4. 538-Nate (Silver) calculated an electoral map using the Dem primary results..

Reply to LiberalFighter (Original post)

Wed Jun 8, 2016, 10:06 AM

Jun 2016

i.e. Hill's vs Sanders' winning states. It came out 399 to 139. (These data guys seem to do strange things for fun.)

You can see the map here:
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/740415945525604352

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»If the DNC used the GOP m...