Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(69,201 posts)
Sat Mar 7, 2026, 05:45 AM 5 hrs ago

Judge declares mistrial after courthouse therapy dog wanders into room with jurors. Here's why

News

Judge declares mistrial after courthouse therapy dog wanders into room with jurors. Here’s why

Published: Mar. 06, 2026, 7:06 p.m.
By John Beauge | Special to PennLive

LOCK HAVEN—A dog on Friday caused a mistrial in the criminal trial of a Dauphin County man accused of killing a dog owned by neighbors at his hunting cabin.

Judge Michael F. Salisbury declared the mistrial Friday after the courthouse therapy dog, a black lab, inadvertently got into room where jurors in the trial of Robert W. Wallish III were gathering following their lunch break. ... The Hummelstown man is charged with killing a neighbor’s yellow-mix lab in 2024 while staying at his Clinton County cabin.

The therapy dog named Clark was in the courthouse Friday with his probation office handler. ... Its leash was dropped and it went into the jury room where it mingled with and was petted by jurors.

Upon being told of what occurred, Salisbury called defense attorney Sarah Marie Lockwood and District Attorney David Strouse into his chambers to discuss an “issue of concern.” ... After briefing Wallish, Lockwood moved for a mistrial. Strouse had asked for a polling of the jurors and suggested a curative instruction could avoid a mistrial.

{snip}
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge declares mistrial after courthouse therapy dog wanders into room with jurors. Here's why (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves 5 hrs ago OP
I get it. It's a darn shame, but it is good decision. marble falls 2 hrs ago #1
Yeah, but it would not have changed my (or I'd bet most juror's) already strong feeling hlthe2b 55 min ago #2

hlthe2b

(113,608 posts)
2. Yeah, but it would not have changed my (or I'd bet most juror's) already strong feeling
Sat Mar 7, 2026, 10:26 AM
55 min ago

about the defendant and the crime for which he was indicted assuming the evidence was clear. I'd be ready to string this a'hole up before I ever stepped in the jury room (and that is from a staunch death penalty opponent).

Still, avoiding an unnecessary overturn on appeal matters...

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Weird News»Judge declares mistrial a...