Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(79,936 posts)
Thu Nov 20, 2025, 01:51 AM 13 hrs ago

Montana Supreme Court blocks AG's rewrite of nonpartisan court elections measure

(CN) — Montana’s attorney general took too much liberty editing ballot language for an initiative pushing for nonpartisan court elections, according to a new ruling from the state Supreme Court.

Constitutional Initiative 132 would create a new section of the constitution to mandate that court elections stay free from political affiliations. The text would read: “Section 12. Nonpartisan Judicial Elections. Judicial elections shall remain nonpartisan.”

It was submitted by Montanans for Nonpartisan Courts with proposed ballot language stating that the initiative “amends the Montana Constitution to require that judicial elections remain nonpartisan.”

Attorney General Austin Knudsen revised the statement to instead say the initiative, if passed, “amends Article VII of the Montana Constitution to create a new Section 12 that mandates all judicial elections be nonpartisan. A nonpartisan election prohibits labeling candidates on the ballot according to the political party the candidate aligns with including labels like independent.”




https://www.courthousenews.com/montana-supreme-court-blocks-ags-rewrite-of-nonpartisan-court-elections-measure/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Montana Supreme Court blocks AG's rewrite of nonpartisan court elections measure (Original Post) RandySF 13 hrs ago OP
That might have been... 2naSalit 10 hrs ago #1

2naSalit

(99,025 posts)
1. That might have been...
Thu Nov 20, 2025, 05:01 AM
10 hrs ago

Prudent last century but now, you really need to know who the justices are, in present day Montana, it's a must.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Montana»Montana Supreme Court blo...