Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(131,453 posts)
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:43 PM 16 hrs ago

An interesting comparison of this weekend's party conventions. From FB (sorry, but this is pretty good):

The parties' respective moments of silence (scroll down) was especially disturbing.

This weekend, Minnesota's two major political parties gathered on opposite ends of the state to choose candidates for the fall. The DFL met in Rochester. Republicans met in Duluth.
At some point, both conventions paused for a moment of silence.
We'll come back to that.
Before getting into the weekend, it's worth remembering what conventions actually tell us.
An endorsement is not an election. Minnesota voters have a long history of ignoring convention delegates. Tim Walz lost the DFL endorsement in 2018 and still became governor.
Conventions don't tell us who will win in November. They tell us what each party's most engaged activists care about right now.
In Rochester, the dominant mood was grief, anxiety, and determination.
Many delegates were attending their first convention. Some traced their political awakening to Operation Metro Surge and the wave of immigration enforcement activity that swept through Twin Cities communities this winter. Others came because they were worried about health care, housing costs, public education, or what they see as growing threats to democratic institutions.
The energy in the room often ran well to Amy Klobuchar's left.
Yet when it came time to vote, delegates overwhelmingly endorsed a four-term incumbent with a long record of statewide success.
That choice says something.
The activists were angry. But they were also pragmatic.
One delegate who described herself as "much to the left of Amy" put it bluntly: "We can't be the state that has the MyPillow guy as governor."
The Senate race was different. There, delegates felt freer to vote with their hearts, endorsing Peggy Flanagan over Angie Craig despite Craig's fundraising advantage. For many, Craig's vote for one of Donald Trump's signature immigration measures remained a dealbreaker.
Even so, Flanagan's message centered less on ideology than affordability: wages, housing, health care, and making everyday life easier for working families.
In that sense, she wasn't all that different from Klobuchar.
In Duluth, the conversation revolved around a different set of concerns.
Republicans haven't won a statewide race in Minnesota since 2006, and delegates repeatedly returned to themes of government fraud, accountability, and what they view as failures of Democratic leadership.
But where DFL delegates often gravitated toward candidates with proven statewide appeal, Republican delegates repeatedly rewarded candidates who argued against moderation.
For Senate, they passed over Michele Tafoya and endorsed Adam Schwarze, who argued Republicans shouldn't have to compromise in order to win.
For governor, they chose Kendall Qualls after ten rounds of voting, passing over House Speaker Lisa Demuth, whose experience in divided government gave her a record of negotiation and deal-making. And ironically, her determination to avoid votes on guns and immigration earned her minimal credit with delegates.
What stood out wasn't just the candidates.
It was what was driving the people supporting them.
For many DFL delegates, the crisis felt personal and immediate.
Operation Metro Surge wasn't a cable news story. It was something that happened in their communities. Workers missed shifts. Parents kept children home from school. People delayed medical appointments. The consequences showed up in neighborhoods, workplaces, congregations, and families.
For many Republican delegates, the crisis was ideological.
The dominant issue was fraud. Fraud is real. It matters. But it also fits neatly into a broader belief that government is too large, too expensive, and too ineffective to solve major problems. Every scandal becomes further evidence for an argument that already exists.
That's not a judgment about motives. It's an observation about incentives.
In Rochester, delegates were responding to disruptions they felt in their daily lives.
In Duluth, delegates were responding to a belief about what government is and what it does.
That distinction explains a lot.
Of course, neither convention is Minnesota.
The voters who decide statewide elections aren't spending their weekends debating amendments or standing through ten rounds of balloting. They're working late shifts, coaching Little League, helping kids with homework, or simply trying to get through the week. Many won't start paying close attention until the fall.
Those voters will have the final say.
But conventions still matter because they reveal how each party understands the challenges facing the state.

In Rochester, delegates said the central questions are whether people can afford their lives, access health care, and feel secure in their communities.
In Duluth, delegates said the central questions are fraud, government failure, and resistance to compromise.
Remember those moments of silence we mentioned? Here's who they were for.

In Rochester, delegates honored Melissa Hortman — the former House Speaker assassinated alongside her husband, Mark, in their Brooklyn Park home last June.

In Duluth, delegates approved a moment of silence for Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis police officer convicted of murdering George Floyd and now serving a federal prison sentence. The request came the morning after the sixth anniversary of Floyd's death.


Same weekend. Same state. Just a few hours apart on I-35.
It's difficult to imagine a clearer illustration of how differently these two parties understand the moment we're living through.
The endorsements themselves may or may not matter by November.
The priorities behind them almost certainly will.

https://www.facebook.com/MNIndivisibleAlliance

Derek Fucking Chauvin! Right after the 6th anniversary of George Floyd's death!
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An interesting comparison of this weekend's party conventions. From FB (sorry, but this is pretty good): (Original Post) Ocelot II 16 hrs ago OP
How do you wrap your mind around that? How can anyone have one molecule of sympathy for that Diamond_Dog 15 hrs ago #1
I didn't think there was much that the GOP could do that would shock me, but *that* did. Ocelot II 15 hrs ago #2
Thank you for the detailed description. Derek Chauvin? Still around? question everything 15 hrs ago #3

Diamond_Dog

(41,236 posts)
1. How do you wrap your mind around that? How can anyone have one molecule of sympathy for that
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:01 PM
15 hrs ago

psychopath? How can anyone who walks, talks, and breathes not see that Floyd’s death was a tragedy of epic proportions?

Ocelot II

(131,453 posts)
2. I didn't think there was much that the GOP could do that would shock me, but *that* did.
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:13 PM
15 hrs ago

Derek Chauvin was a bad cop with a long history of abusing suspects, and he was recorded holding his knee on Floyd's neck for nine minutes. He was convicted of murder by a jury in one of the most well-tried cases you are ever going to see, and all of his appeals failed. How in God's name they could justify honoring him is absolutely beyond me. But that's the GOP for you. Maybe they're holding off on Melissa Hortman's murderer until the next convention.

question everything

(52,476 posts)
3. Thank you for the detailed description. Derek Chauvin? Still around?
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:13 PM
15 hrs ago

These positions are so wide apart that one wonders how the independents will decide.

I am also curious of whether the Democrats mentioned the elephant in the room: the frauds.

Whether we like it or not it will be a topic in the campaign.

The R’s “stand on principles” remind me of when I lived in California. There, too, they used the same mantra, nominated extremists and lost all state offices.


Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Minnesota»An interesting comparison...