Maryland
Related: About this forumJudge tosses Trump administration lawsuit against Maryland judges over immigration order.
A federal judge on Tuesday threw out the Trump administration's challenge to a standing order issued by a U.S. district court in Maryland that bars federal immigration officials from immediately removing migrants who are challenging the legality of their detentions.
The decision from U.S. District Judge Thomas Cullen came in a novel and unprecedented lawsuit that the Trump administration filed against all 15 judges on the Maryland court in June. The Justice Department had argued that the standing order issued by Chief Judge George Russell in May was unlawful and outside the authority of the court.
The judges, represented by Paul Clement, who served as solicitor general under former President George W. Bush, sought to dismiss the lawsuit. They argued that the suit presented a dispute between two co-equal branches of government that could not be decided by the courts.
In a 37-page decision, Cullen agreed with the judges in finding that the Trump administration's challenge should be dismissed because, in part, the U.S. does not have the legal right to sue and the judges are absolute immune from the suit.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/maryland-judges-trump-administration-lawsuit-deportations/

LetMyPeopleVote
(168,558 posts)Judge Thomas Cullen called executive officials remarks in recent months both unprecedented and unfortunate.
Trump appointee calls out Trump administrationâs efforts to âsmearâ judges www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...
— @jimrissmiller.bsky.social 2025-08-26T18:37:41.370Z
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/trump-judges-thomas-cullen-smear-judiciary-rcna227238
U.S. District Judge Thomas Cullen noted that in recent months, executive officials and their spokespeople have described federal district judges across the country as left-wing, liberal, activists, radical, politically minded, rogue, unhinged, outrageous, overzealous, [and] unconstitutional, [c]rooked, and worse.......
But he wrote that this concerted effort by the Executive to smear and impugn individual judges who rule against it is both unprecedented and unfortunate.......
Much as the Executive fights the characterization, a lawsuit by the executive branch of government against the judicial branch for the exercise of judicial power is not ordinary, Cullen wrote in dismissing the case, adding: Whatever the merits of its grievance with the judges of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, the Executive must find a proper way to raise those concerns.,,,,,,
Notably, Cullen cited the Abrego case in his ruling Tuesday. Specifically, he cited an opinion from April by appellate Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, a Reagan appointee who has likewise called out the administrations actions.
Cullen and Wilkinson havent been the only GOP appointees to do so. Its unlikely theyll be the last.
elleng
(140,500 posts)Whatever the merits of its grievance with the judges of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, the Executive must find a proper way to raise those concerns.,,,,,,
Notably, Cullen cited the Abrego case in his ruling Tuesday. Specifically, he cited an opinion from April by appellate Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, a Reagan appointee who has likewise called out the administrations actions.
Cullen and Wilkinson havent been the only GOP appointees to do so. Its unlikely theyll be the last.'