Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(16,737 posts)
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 07:23 AM Tuesday

Del. Supreme Court affirms dismissal of defamation suit against Hunter Biden, et. al.

Order (pdf):

https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=384080


[...]

TRAYNOR, Justice, for the Majority:

This is an appeal from a Superior Court opinion and order that dismissed a computer-repair-shop owner’s defamation claims against a customer, various news outlets, and a political campaign committee, as well as counterclaims brought by the customer against the shop owner. For the reasons that follow, we have concluded that the Superior Court did not err when it held that the allegedly defamatory statements did not concern the plaintiff shop owner and thus were not actionable. Likewise, given the manner in which the customer framed his counterclaims and argued against dismissal in the Superior Court, the court’s dismissal of the customer’s counterclaims on statute-of-limitations grounds was justified. Hence, we affirm the Superior Court’s order.

[...]

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Del. Supreme Court affirms dismissal of defamation suit against Hunter Biden, et. al. (Original Post) sl8 Tuesday OP
K & R................... Lovie777 Tuesday #1
How much has it cost him to defend himself for years against this spurious bullshit? Scrivener7 Tuesday #2
Hunter's lawsuit against the computer store owner was also dismissed MichMan Tuesday #5
So basically the courts looked into it and there's no there, there. Screw that schmuck computor ass for not ... marble falls Tuesday #3
Hunter denied that he ever dropped it off for repair MichMan Tuesday #4
Sounds like a Roger Stone caper. marble falls Tuesday #6
correct azureblue Tuesday #7
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan Tuesday #8

Scrivener7

(56,948 posts)
2. How much has it cost him to defend himself for years against this spurious bullshit?
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 08:02 AM
Tuesday

And they dismissed it because the statute of limitations passed.

MichMan

(15,812 posts)
5. Hunter's lawsuit against the computer store owner was also dismissed
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 09:11 AM
Tuesday

Both parties had rather extensive legal fees I would imagine. The attorneys surely made out handsomely though

marble falls

(67,795 posts)
3. So basically the courts looked into it and there's no there, there. Screw that schmuck computor ass for not ...
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 08:28 AM
Tuesday

... blanking a used computer he's selling.

azureblue

(2,548 posts)
7. correct
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 09:51 AM
Tuesday

There are so many holes in the shop's story it's laughable -
1 - Where is the repair invoice with Hunter's signature and the S/N of the laptop? Nobody just drops a laptop off without a repair invoice, and the signature is needed to protect the shop from liability. Plus, the invoice will list what needs to be done and the contact number. That invoice does not exist.

2 - What was the computer in the shop for?

3 - Does the laptop S/N trace back to Hunter - thus proving ownership? So far, no one has traced the serial number. Where is that laptop / hard drive?

4 - Why would a person on one side of the country drop off a laptop to be repaired, on the other side? Or even out of the city? Hunter has plenty of repair shops where he lives, and he could always send it off to Apple.

5 - Any computer repair shop knows to not look at content, and for sure, to not offer that content to third parties. Just saying it contained sensitive corporate information, and it got out, the shop would get sued big time.

I think this is what happened:
Some GOPer broke into Hunter's iCloud account and downloaded the contents. They got this shop to play ball with them (bribe) - find a Mac laptop, set it up as if Hunter owned it, and load the data, plus additions, to it. The problem is the data was compromised - the idiots did not know that data is date tagged, so they got caught modding Hunter's files, and there were more additions as the laptop was passed around (chain of custody) but they went ahead with the smear campaign anyway and it fizzled when they got caught.

I think Hunter still has a case against the shop. And he should drag that dork into deposition and make him give up his contacts. That's the part Repubs are trying to hide - who got in touch with the shop owner to try to pull off this scam? And that is why the court said Hunter does not have a case - to try to prevent the people involved from being outed..

Response to azureblue (Reply #7)

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Delaware»Del. Supreme Court affirm...