Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

quaint

(3,894 posts)
Sat May 31, 2025, 10:35 AM May 31

Early end to California's jury pay experiment

CalMatters Inequality Insights via email
Can paying jurors a little more money create a more fair system of justice?

California had money to test that question during the COVID-19 pandemic, when multi-billion dollar surpluses gave lawmakers room to experiment. Beginning in 2021, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two laws in successive years allowing pilot programs to increase pay for jury duty to $100 a day, up from $15.

The early results were promising, with a program in San Francisco reporting that the extra money gave lower-income residents more flexibility to serve on a jury.

But now in an era of state budget deficits, Newsom is asking lawmakers to cut short the experiment. He’d save $27.5 million by terminating the two-year pilot program that offers jurors extra money in seven counties.

Several of the counties in the test aren’t waiting for lawmakers to pass Newsom’s budget plan, which is due at the end of June. They shut down their programs immediately after the governor outlined the proposal earlier this month.

“Effective May 19, 2025 the AB 1981 pilot program which provided increased compensation to jurors will be discontinued,” El Dorado Superior Court Executive Officer Shelby Winieger said in a statement that was reported by the legal newspaper the Daily Journal.

Leaders in Alameda County aren’t quite ready to give up the program. Its chief public defender, Brendon Woods, told Joe Garcia of CalMatters “it’s absolutely shameful that this program is being considered to be cut.”

“When you think about the cost of this program — about $27.5 million, and the cost that, as a state, we pay nearly $14 billion to incarcerate people in prison — it’s kind of ridiculous that this small amount was being cut to make sure that our juries are more diverse,” he said.

Good idea, but fiscal reality...

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

patphil

(7,911 posts)
1. As of June 8th, New York State will pay jurors $72. per day.
Sat May 31, 2025, 11:15 AM
May 31

Texas pays $30. the first day, and $58. each day after that.
So, California is paying it's jurors very well, but I don't think it's excessive, nor does it make much of an impact on the state budget.
Doing the math, at $15. the state would still pay $4.125 million to jurors. So the actual savings is only $23.375 million.
Seeing as how the state has proposed a $323 billion budget, and expects a surplus of $363 million, this cut in juror's pay seems ridiculous.

https://calmatters.org/politics/2025/01/gavin-newsom-2025-california-budget/

Gov. Newsom should keep it as is.

MichMan

(15,229 posts)
2. It was a pilot program covering just seven counties
Sat May 31, 2025, 12:51 PM
May 31

Jurors in the other 51 counties would expect it to be expanded to them since it was successful.

Jacson6

(1,323 posts)
3. For civil trials with a jury they should make the plaintiff & defendant pay a fee to provide for the jury.
Sat May 31, 2025, 02:14 PM
May 31

They are suing for a lot of money and they can afford it, especially if they win. The court could always take a portion of any award to help pay for the jury.

The Mouth

(3,352 posts)
4. The real problem is jury selection.
Wed Jun 4, 2025, 01:49 PM
Wednesday

It should be random, no chance for either party to dismiss a juror, and all jurors compensated at whatever their wage rate is. No picking juries, no getting off of jury duty; 12 names, you will be there, you will be paid, no exceptions.

quaint

(3,894 posts)
5. I disagree, mainly because both sides have equal rejects and "no excuses" would hurt many.
Wed Jun 4, 2025, 04:42 PM
Wednesday

I was excused (only time I asked for excuse) the last time I received notice to report because there is no bus service to my town and my call was for the first Monday after Labor Day. Uber would be $25 normally and much more on that day.

People with small children have difficulty finding care and transportation.

Would you not compensate people without jobs?

Would you have yourself judged by twelve conservative elders?

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Early end to California's...