Photography
Related: About this forumJust when you thought it was safe: Volvo EX90's Lidar Sensor Will Fry Your Phone's Camera
https://www.thedrive.com/news/volvo-ex90s-lidar-sensor-will-fry-your-phones-camera
Try to record a car's lidar sensor, and you'll see a trail of multicolored specks in its wake. Those are freshly fried pixels on the camera's image sensor. Screenshot via Reddit, The Drive
Oh {expletive}!!!
snip
It should be said that the risk here is inherent to lidar technology, and has nothing to do with Volvo’s specific implementation on the EX90. In fact, earlier this year, the automaker even issued a warning against directing external cameras at the vehicle’s lidar pod for the very reasons discussed. “Do not point a camera directly at the lidar,” one support page admonishes in no uncertain terms. Unfortunately, while that sort of information might be clear to owners (the ones who crack open their vehicles’ manuals, anyway), this is something the entire public ought to be aware of, especially as semi-autonomous cars with lidar systems become more common on our streets.
snip
The company specifically called out “close-ups” as the problem, meaning that our phones should be safe with distant shots, and also offered a tip for those of us who may need to capture such images. (Thank you!) “Using filters or protective covers on the camera lens can help reduce the impact of lidar exposure,” Volvo said. “Some cameras are designed with built-in protections against high-intensity light sources.”
Do you get that? Take photos with your lens cap on! Now I have to test my filters for infrared transmission. And cell phones? Good luck with that.
The sensor Volvo uses in the EX90 is understood to be eye-safe, even if it’s not necessarily camera-safe. We’re no experts on laser imaging, so we’ll defer to Lidar News, which published back in January that “[t]he human eye is mostly sensitive to light in the visible spectrum (roughly 400-700nm) and less sensitive to [near-infrared] light. Because 1550nm is at a safer wavelength for the human eye, [the EX90’s laser] can operate at higher power.” Higher power translates to longer range, which is obviously critical for vehicles built to achieve any level of self-driving.
Duplicate post due to a network glitch was deleted.

Bernardo de La Paz
(56,076 posts)usonian
(17,973 posts)The Luminar Iris uses a single 1550nm fiber laser. This wavelength is in the near-infrared (NIR) region of the electromagnetic spectrum – invisible to the human eye. So, you are not going to know whether the laser scanner you are photographing is on or off.
The 1550nm wavelength has many favorable properties. The human eye is mostly sensitive to light in the visible spectrum (roughly 400-700nm) and less sensitive to NIR light. Because 1550nm is at a safer wavelength (1) for the human eye, it can operate at higher power. The Luminar Iris operates with 1,000,000x pulse energy of 905nm while staying eye-safe. Higher power means longer ranges, an important property for autonomous vehicles.
Can infrared light harm your eyes?
UV light is a known contributor to cataracts.
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/8589-cataracts-age-related
And so are microwaves.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3068822/
Infrared is somewhere in-between.
(1) Is it really "safer"? Safer than what?
So now I have to test my camera filters, eyeglasses and polarized sunglasses for transmission curves?
Bernardo de La Paz
(56,076 posts)usonian
(17,973 posts)By looking for pods on an auto, you are staring into it.
I avert my eyes for those bright headlights!
I posted earlier on the study which showed that they are getting brighter over time.
What if one of my landscape photos accidentally captures a high power infrared beam?
Those camera sensors are damn expensive!
Not having an infrared transmissometer, I'll look up curves on camera lenses and filters, eyeglasses, sunglasses and windshield???
Life got tougher, I guess.
Bernardo de La Paz
(56,076 posts)If I see the bump it does NOT mean I'm staring at it.
Likewise if I see the bump, it does not mean a beam struck my eyes. For one thing I might see at a 90 degree angle. And if it does before I avert my gaze, that is still less than if I don't avert my gaze.
Life is not perfect.