Photography
Related: About this forum
Easterncedar
(4,486 posts)It makes me want, for the first time, to learn the names of all those features I can see so clearly now. Thanks for the wonderful sight!
Mousetoescamper
(6,293 posts)
riverbendviewgal
(4,357 posts)Such an awesome photo. Than you for sharing.
Mousetoescamper
(6,293 posts)
KS Toronado
(21,052 posts)

Mousetoescamper
(6,293 posts)
John1956PA
(4,144 posts)Is the image rotated ninety degrees clockwise?
Mousetoescamper
(6,293 posts)The image isn't rotated.
John1956PA
(4,144 posts)
The discrepancy in rotation between the two images seems to be 90 degrees.
Mousetoescamper
(6,293 posts)My photo was taken at 12:13 AM today.
John1956PA
(4,144 posts)The orientation of the lunarscape in my photo is about 45 degrees counterclockwise from the orientation shown in the above image from Fourmilab. I think that the Fourmilab image shows the moon as it appeared on midnight on December 12.
Mousetoescamper
(6,293 posts)What's your point with this exercise? What do you require?
CaliforniaPeggy
(154,169 posts)Words fail me.
I've never seen the moon at this angle before. It looks so spherical, so luminous. I am gobsmacked!
Mousetoescamper
(6,293 posts)The sky was clear and the moon was nearly full (coming Dec. 15). I don't usually try to shoot this phase because it lacks the shadows that make the craters and mountains pop. As an experiment I matched the exposure time to the ISO. The photo turned out better than expected.
ISO 100 (my usual setting for the moon)
f16
1/100 sec