Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ordinary wall clock. Says to use carbon batteries only. Do not use alkalines. Why would that be? (Original Post) Norrrm Sep 4 OP
As I've also wondered, I went down the rabbit hole... quaint Sep 4 #1
I put in an alkaline. Norrrm Sep 4 #3
Makes sense to me. quaint Sep 4 #4
I Would Ignore The Advice ProfessorGAC Sep 4 #2

quaint

(4,156 posts)
1. As I've also wondered, I went down the rabbit hole...
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 03:12 PM
Sep 4
Conflicting, opposing opinions. Science I didn't understand.
This was more informative than other articles but doesn't really answer the question.

Norrrm

(2,987 posts)
3. I put in an alkaline.
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 07:36 PM
Sep 4

If alkalines have more current capacity, available energy, then it would seem
logical to use alkalines. If you're selling clocks, you want to equip them with the
cheapest battery available.

ProfessorGAC

(74,453 posts)
2. I Would Ignore The Advice
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 06:09 PM
Sep 4

I'm an expert in chemistry but not necessarily battery chemistry, so this is an informed but, not authoritative opinion.
Conventional carbon-zinc batteries have lower stability & more heavy metals, so I tuonk there has to be a convincing & irrefutable reason for avoiding alkaline.
I haven't purchased conventional batteries in probably 40 years, so every clock we've ever had used alkaline batteries.
I would never consider changing even for low demand electronics like a vlock.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Ordinary wall clock. Says...