Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsOrdinary wall clock. Says to use carbon batteries only. Do not use alkalines. Why would that be?
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61yDCYxau+L._AC_SL1500_.jpg
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Ordinary wall clock. Says to use carbon batteries only. Do not use alkalines. Why would that be? (Original Post)
Norrrm
Sep 4
OP
Norrrm
(2,987 posts)3. I put in an alkaline.
If alkalines have more current capacity, available energy, then it would seem
logical to use alkalines. If you're selling clocks, you want to equip them with the
cheapest battery available.
quaint
(4,156 posts)4. Makes sense to me.
ProfessorGAC
(74,453 posts)2. I Would Ignore The Advice
I'm an expert in chemistry but not necessarily battery chemistry, so this is an informed but, not authoritative opinion.
Conventional carbon-zinc batteries have lower stability & more heavy metals, so I tuonk there has to be a convincing & irrefutable reason for avoiding alkaline.
I haven't purchased conventional batteries in probably 40 years, so every clock we've ever had used alkaline batteries.
I would never consider changing even for low demand electronics like a vlock.