Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(16,349 posts)
Sat Apr 19, 2025, 07:14 AM Saturday

SPOT THE SCAM: Unmasking Fake Rescues

Last edited Sat Apr 19, 2025, 10:39 AM - Edit history (3)

I've noticed a number of fake animal rescue videos posted here recently. I think folks should reconsider before posting/reposting them or giving them "likes" or "recs". They are bad news for many reasons, not least of which is that the animals are often endangered (e.g., putting them in unnatural physical danger, sedating an animal and then "resuscitating" it, etc.), all for the sake of social media "likes" and/or donations.

I respectfully encourage folks to look at the site below & read their report, or do your own internet search for "fake animal rescue videos". It's a growing problem.

It's a nasty business and I don't think it has any place on DU.

https://www.smaccoalition.com/fake-rescue-report

Report:
https://www.smaccoalition.com/_files/ugd/4e12f3_335b2ed0535246d6bd6d681ad604134c.pdf


SMACC’s latest research shows the truth behind fake rescue content: animals are being harmed and viewers are being scammed.

[...]

This content shows humans “rescuing” sick and injured animals, animals trapped and stuck under heavy objects and some even on the verge of drowning. In these staged scenarios, all set up by the content creator, animals are put in danger and situations of distress. Very little is known about what happens to the animals before, or after these video clips.

Kittens, puppies and young monkeys are the main victims. Young and vulnerable, they are prone to abuse.

In SMACC’s latest research, over a third of the content showed animals apparently “abandoned”, often by the side of the road, in rubbish dumps and bins. SMACC is particularly concerned about the potential staging of these situations, as there are suspicions that some animals may have been deliberately harmed or manipulated for the sake of content



[...]



Much more at website.




10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SPOT THE SCAM: Unmasking Fake Rescues (Original Post) sl8 Saturday OP
Omg! SheltieLover Saturday #1
Humans can be terrible. madaboutharry Saturday #2
I've long suspected as much 10 Turtle Day Saturday #3
i do wish we had a rule against 'fake'. mopinko Saturday #4
re: note with alert - allow only short note RandomNumbers Saturday #9
that wd b fine. i dont rly know y it was discontinued. mopinko Saturday #10
Yes- I found this out watching them on Youtube Meowmee Saturday #5
Thank you for that. nt sl8 Saturday #7
Thanks for the heads up on this practice. Probably trying to juice up their donations I guess, but I think it is SWBTATTReg Saturday #6
Most of them are fake. Linda ladeewolf Saturday #8

mopinko

(72,297 posts)
4. i do wish we had a rule against 'fake'.
Sat Apr 19, 2025, 08:49 AM
Saturday

i realize this is a tough thing for jurors, sometimes. but we’re a smart bunch.

i also wish we cd include a note w an alert. i was a mod back in the day, when u cd do that. those comments so often informed us of things we didnt know.
i can remember many alerts for antisemitic tropes that i didnt recognize.

i feel like the whole world is lies these days.

RandomNumbers

(18,547 posts)
9. re: note with alert - allow only short note
Sat Apr 19, 2025, 10:22 AM
Saturday

like, limit to 40 characters. That might avoid some issues. (I think way back, we could include a note with an alert, and that was stopped because of some problems. But I might not be remembering correctly.

Being able to add a short note would allow the alerter to clarify the specific issue they see with the post, without allowing a long rant or ramble for the jury to digest.

mopinko

(72,297 posts)
10. that wd b fine. i dont rly know y it was discontinued.
Sat Apr 19, 2025, 10:29 AM
Saturday

it went away when the juries came in.
we didnt get many big rants, tho.

Meowmee

(8,700 posts)
5. Yes- I found this out watching them on Youtube
Sat Apr 19, 2025, 09:17 AM
Saturday

It is disgusting and very upsetting to say the least. One video showed a kitten that was spray painted blue and they were supposedly rescuing her, but it was obvious they were the ones that did that and made the video pretending they saved her to make money etc. I reported a few of those channels but they just pop up again under other names.

The most obvious thing to look out for is there is no way these people came across all of these cats/dogs/kittens etc. in these situations, over and over again, and made a professional video etc.

There was a video about these fake channels on YT also- about people trying to report them etc.
Here is a link to another one... this is not the one I found when I realized it, I can't find that one now.

?feature=shared


SWBTATTReg

(25,182 posts)
6. Thanks for the heads up on this practice. Probably trying to juice up their donations I guess, but I think it is
Sat Apr 19, 2025, 09:42 AM
Saturday

deception to fake rescues.

Linda ladeewolf

(839 posts)
8. Most of them are fake.
Sat Apr 19, 2025, 10:06 AM
Saturday

Those turtles rescues are mostly fake. The ones with glued on barnacles. The ones with the puppies or kittens in odd places is mostly fake, No one rescues that many kittens or puppies without putting them in the situation in the first place. Then there are the starving nearly dead animals, the animals condition is real, but they were likely starved nearly to death just so they could be brought back. The real ones would be posted by legitimate rescue operations with real connections.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»SPOT THE SCAM: Unmasking ...