Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsLLM aka Large Legal Mess: Judge wants lawyer fined $15K for using AI slop in filing
https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/25/fine_sought_ai_filing_mistakes/A federal magistrate judge has recommended $15,000 in sanctions be imposed on an attorney who cited non-existent court cases concocted by an AI chatbot.
In a report [PDF] filed last week, Mark J. Dinsmore, US Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of Indiana, recommends that attorney Rafael Ramirez, of Rio, Hondo, Texas, be "sanctioned $15,000 for his violations in this case $5,000 for each of the three briefs filed by Mr Ramirez where he failed to appropriately verify the validity and accuracy of the case law he cited to the court and opposing counsel."
...
"Transposing numbers in a citation, getting the date wrong, or misspelling a party's name is an error," the judge wrote.
"Citing to a case that simply does not exist is something else altogether. Mr Ramirez offers no hint of an explanation for how a case citation made up out of whole cloth ended up in his brief. The most obvious explanation is that Mr Ramirez used an AI-generative tool to aid in drafting his brief and failed to check the citations therein before filing it."
...
In a report [PDF] filed last week, Mark J. Dinsmore, US Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of Indiana, recommends that attorney Rafael Ramirez, of Rio, Hondo, Texas, be "sanctioned $15,000 for his violations in this case $5,000 for each of the three briefs filed by Mr Ramirez where he failed to appropriately verify the validity and accuracy of the case law he cited to the court and opposing counsel."
...
"Transposing numbers in a citation, getting the date wrong, or misspelling a party's name is an error," the judge wrote.
"Citing to a case that simply does not exist is something else altogether. Mr Ramirez offers no hint of an explanation for how a case citation made up out of whole cloth ended up in his brief. The most obvious explanation is that Mr Ramirez used an AI-generative tool to aid in drafting his brief and failed to check the citations therein before filing it."
...
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LLM aka Large Legal Mess: Judge wants lawyer fined $15K for using AI slop in filing (Original Post)
erronis
Feb 24
OP
SheltieLover
(66,761 posts)1. When did people become too lazy to fact check & write professionally?
Good for the judge! Should've been a much bigger fine imo.
highplainsdem
(55,504 posts)2. I agree!

SheltieLover
(66,761 posts)3. Surreal! If one doesn't like to write, choose a different career

