Editorials & Other Articles

Dulcinea

(9,399 posts) Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:29 PM Saturday

US lawmakers intensify calls for Andrew to address Epstein ties

LONDON (Reuters) -Members of a U.S. congressional committee investigating the Jeffrey Epstein case have intensified their calls for Andrew Mountbatten Windsor to answer questions about his ties to the late financier and sex offender, the BBC reported on Saturday.

King Charles stripped Andrew of his title of prince and evicted him from his mansion in the grounds of Windsor Castle on Thursday, responding to the outrage that had built around the royal over years of damaging headlines about his behaviour.

Buckingham Palace said the censures were needed even though Andrew has continued to deny the allegations made against him.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/us-lawmakers-intensify-calls-andrew-113100994.html

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US lawmakers intensify calls for Andrew to address Epstein ties (Original Post) Dulcinea Saturday OP

IMO, it would depend on the price, don't you think? no_hypocrisy Saturday #1

WTF?? I click on the link, and an entire yahoo page about consent niyad Saturday #2

That's strange. Dulcinea Saturday #3

I had to go to the very bottom of the page to reject all. I had never seen niyad Saturday #6

You probably set your cookie consent some time previous. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Saturday #8

Consent and cookie management is not BS. It protects you and is required by European law. Bernardo de La Paz Saturday #7

As I said, I had never seen that overlay or whatever it was, before. niyad Saturday #10

FUCK YOU, reuters. It is DEMOCRATIC Congressmember. niyad Saturday #4

It's Mr. Andrew Windsor. We are not on first name basis and I doubt you are. You dont have to copy the title verbatim Bernardo de La Paz Saturday #5

Actually, it is Rapist Scum andrew. niyad Saturday #9

I notice your pointed capitalization. Cheers. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Saturday #11

Thank you. niyad Saturday #13

How about demanding answers from the wannabe king, pedo rapist? niyad Saturday #12

no_hypocrisy

(53,659 posts)

1. IMO, it would depend on the price, don't you think?

Reply to Dulcinea (Original post)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:30 PM

Saturday

niyad

(128,257 posts)

2. WTF?? I click on the link, and an entire yahoo page about consent

Reply to Dulcinea (Original post)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:31 PM

Saturday

and cookies comes up. Fuck that bs.

Dulcinea

(9,399 posts)

3. That's strange.

Reply to niyad (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:33 PM

Saturday

I double checked & it worked fine for me.

niyad

(128,257 posts)

6. I had to go to the very bottom of the page to reject all. I had never seen

Reply to Dulcinea (Reply #3)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:40 PM

Saturday

that blue page in a yahoo link before.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,153 posts)

8. You probably set your cookie consent some time previous. . . . . nt

Reply to Dulcinea (Reply #3)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:43 PM

Saturday

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,153 posts)

7. Consent and cookie management is not BS. It protects you and is required by European law.

Reply to niyad (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:42 PM

Saturday

Notice the 237 partners they sell your data to.

Just click Reject All and read the article.

It's actually an overlay, not a separate page.

niyad

(128,257 posts)

10. As I said, I had never seen that overlay or whatever it was, before.

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #7)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:47 PM

Saturday

I did get to the article.

niyad

(128,257 posts)

4. FUCK YOU, reuters. It is DEMOCRATIC Congressmember.

Reply to Dulcinea (Original post)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:37 PM

Saturday

One would think that reuters, which USED to be reputable, would know the difference between a noun and an adjective, and not follow the bullshit, deliberately insulting framing frim the rwnj's and their propaganda machine.