Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Will Our Corporate Media Godzillas Have the Guts to Defend Democracy? -- Norman Ornstein
https://newrepublic.com/article/201041/corporate-media-consolidation-defend-democracy-trumpFive companiesfivenow control 90 percent of the media marketplace. And they are showing no commitment to anything resembling the public interest.
In 1997, President Bill Clinton tabbed me to co-chair a Presidential Advisory Committee on the Public Interest Obligations of Digital Television Broadcasters, to report to Vice President Al Gore. Ever since the Telecommunications Act of 1934, broadcasters (then radio, later television), given the gift of free airwaves from the public, had pledged in return to act in the public interest. Airwaves worth billions, for free. But in the late 1990s, technology had changed the nature of televisionthe digital era meant we were moving from stations and networks with one venue to having dozens, the advent of hundreds of channels, and a need to take a new look, in a new era, at how the transition to digital television would uphold or potentially erode the public benefits of free, local, over-the-air broadcasting.
. . .
But there is another way the media world is different. Five companiesfivenow control 90 percent of the marketplace. Disney, Comcast, Warner Brothers Discovery, Paramount, and Fox are the media Godzillas, and if Ellison and Paramount get their way and purchase WBD, it will be four. Add to that the fact that right-wing billionaires dominate social media, from X to Meta and now TikTok, and other billionaires with wide business interests that are affected directly by federal government action own The Washington Post and Los Angeles Times, among others of our key newspapers, and we are in an extraordinarily dangerous place. And add further the evisceration via government cuts of public media like NPR and PBS, hitting rural areas especially hard.
. . .
Of course, some of this dynamic has been deliberately manipulated by those malign actors like Elon Musk, using smallby their standardportions of their vast wealth to buy, transform, and shape key new communications avenues and tools. And it now describes Trumps illegal actions involving TikTok, violating the law and engineering a takeover by Peter Thiel and other allies of his authoritarianism. Some of these entities have a history of turning a blind eye to manipulation of elections from Russia, China, and other foreign actors. We can expect more of that. The combination of malign actors manipulating platforms like X and Facebook and taking over TikTok, alongside billionaires and huge corporate conglomerates who will do anything to avoid authoritarian retribution, has left us with a desolate media landscape.
. . .
But we are dangerously close to having the vast majority of audiences out there getting information solely or largely from sources either directly manipulating the content, or making sure to downplay or ignore anything Trump does not like or want. If we continue to devolve in this way, we will look more like the countries of Russia, Hungary, and China than our own constitutional democracy. Any hope of having the pillar of a free press to provide a meaningful guardrail against incipient authoritarianism will disappear before our very eyes. As my commission experience showed, the Golden Age of broadcasting ended before the new century began. Enter the Dark Ages of media.
. . .
But there is another way the media world is different. Five companiesfivenow control 90 percent of the marketplace. Disney, Comcast, Warner Brothers Discovery, Paramount, and Fox are the media Godzillas, and if Ellison and Paramount get their way and purchase WBD, it will be four. Add to that the fact that right-wing billionaires dominate social media, from X to Meta and now TikTok, and other billionaires with wide business interests that are affected directly by federal government action own The Washington Post and Los Angeles Times, among others of our key newspapers, and we are in an extraordinarily dangerous place. And add further the evisceration via government cuts of public media like NPR and PBS, hitting rural areas especially hard.
. . .
Of course, some of this dynamic has been deliberately manipulated by those malign actors like Elon Musk, using smallby their standardportions of their vast wealth to buy, transform, and shape key new communications avenues and tools. And it now describes Trumps illegal actions involving TikTok, violating the law and engineering a takeover by Peter Thiel and other allies of his authoritarianism. Some of these entities have a history of turning a blind eye to manipulation of elections from Russia, China, and other foreign actors. We can expect more of that. The combination of malign actors manipulating platforms like X and Facebook and taking over TikTok, alongside billionaires and huge corporate conglomerates who will do anything to avoid authoritarian retribution, has left us with a desolate media landscape.
. . .
But we are dangerously close to having the vast majority of audiences out there getting information solely or largely from sources either directly manipulating the content, or making sure to downplay or ignore anything Trump does not like or want. If we continue to devolve in this way, we will look more like the countries of Russia, Hungary, and China than our own constitutional democracy. Any hope of having the pillar of a free press to provide a meaningful guardrail against incipient authoritarianism will disappear before our very eyes. As my commission experience showed, the Golden Age of broadcasting ended before the new century began. Enter the Dark Ages of media.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Will Our Corporate Media Godzillas Have the Guts to Defend Democracy? -- Norman Ornstein (Original Post)
erronis
Tuesday
OP
dweller
(27,234 posts)1. Videodrome
Writ large
😑
✌🏻
erronis
(21,449 posts)3. 'twasn't familiar with this. I may pass on watching before trying to get some sleep....
dweller
(27,234 posts)4. A cult classic
Saw it on home video in the early 90s , as one review stated once youve seen it , you never stop thinking of it .
A thread this morning here was about the media creation of the Pisswig
and I think the comparison between the two is apt . Ive brought this up before .
As McLuhan said : the medium is the message or is that the medium is the massage .. the character of OBlivion in Videodrome is based on McLuhan .
Its a campy movie , but yeh can disturb your dreams I suppose .
✌🏻
msongs
(72,582 posts)2. short answer NO nt