Pam Bondi Needs a Free Speech Tutorial - WSJ Editorial
(snip)
Discussing Kirks work on college campuses, Ms. Bondi mentioned the disgusting antisemitism on display at many universities, and so far so good. But wait. Theres free speech and then theres hate speech, and there is no placeespecially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society, the countrys top law enforcer told a podcast. We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.
Kirk would want a word. My position is that even hate speech should be completely and totally allowed in our country. The most disgusting speech should absolutely be protected, he once told a crowd. The ACLU used to hold this viewpoint. The American Civil Liberties Union, they sued so that legitimate Nazis could march through downtown Skokie. Why? As soon as you use the word hate, that is a very subjective term, Kirk said, in a video posted by his group in 2020. Then all of a sudden it is in the eyes, or it is in the implementation, of whomever has the power.
(snip)
Free speech isnt absolute in the U.S., but the exceptions are narrow, and hate speech isnt one of them. The Supreme Court held in a famous 1969 case, Brandenburg v. Ohio, that the government can punish speech as incitement only if its directed toward, and likely to produce, imminent lawless action. General expressions of hate on the internet are despicable, but they arent cause for prosecution.
Ms. Bondi tried Tuesday morning to clean up her mess, writing on social media: Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is NOT protected by the First Amendment. But then she incoherently mixed in everything from violent rhetoric, to doxxing, to calling a SWAT team to the home of a Member of Congress. The AG also didnt recant her statement on Monday that the Justice Department might prosecute Office Depot or its ex-employee who refused to print a Kirk vigil poster.
Ms. Bondi hasnt had a distinguished tenure as AG, as she too often seems to follow the latest social-media, cable-TV mood swing. But she is a law enforcer, not a social-media anger management coach, and shes sworn to uphold the Constitution. Maybe Ms. Bondi should quit appearing on podcasts about Charlie Kirk until she listens to some Charlie Kirk podcasts
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/pam-bondi-free-speech-hate-speech-charlie-kirk-first-amendment-a4f09203?st=u6mYKB&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
free

Response to question everything (Original post)
Skittles This message was self-deleted by its author.
Skittles
(167,443 posts)if it was Dems cancelling repuke critics......
Uncle Joe
(63,165 posts)"Free speech isnt absolute in the U.S., but the exceptions are narrow, and hate speech isnt one of them. The Supreme Court held in a famous 1969 case, Brandenburg v. Ohio, that the government can punish speech as incitement only if its directed toward, and likely to produce, imminent lawless action. General expressions of hate on the internet are despicable, but they arent cause for prosecution."
Thanks for the thread question everything
Aristus
(70,880 posts)You think they would be goosestepping and Sieg-Heil-ing in agreement.