Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(128,722 posts)
Mon Sep 15, 2025, 02:11 PM Monday

Supreme Court's blanket acceptance of racial profiling

By Erika D. Smith / Bloomberg Opinion

Some 65 million people living in America today identify as Latino or Hispanic. About 16 million of them live in California. Some are undocumented immigrants, but many are, of course, U.S. citizens or legal immigrants. In Los Angeles County alone, where roughly 1 in 3 residents are immigrants, there are nearly 5 million Latinos. And in the city of L.A., roughly half of its 4 million residents are Latino.

These numbers are important for parsing the dire implications of this week’s ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, which overturned a federal judge in Los Angeles and essentially gave Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents carte blanche to resume harassing anyone they think might be an undocumented immigrant using little more than racial profiling as a justification.

In a concurring opinion, offering a window into the reasoning of the court’s otherwise silent conservative majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote that “reasonable suspicion means only that immigration officers may briefly stop the individual and inquire about immigration status. If the person is a U.S. citizen or otherwise lawfully in the United States, that individual will be free to go after the brief encounter.”

To be clear, over the summer, some of those “brief encounters” included American-born Latinos being grabbed off sidewalks, slammed against walls, handcuffed and detained because they couldn’t remember something as arcane as the name of the hospital where they were born. Some were detained for only a few minutes. Others were held for days.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/comment-supreme-courts-blanket-acceptance-of-racial-profiling/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court's blanket acceptance of racial profiling (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Monday OP
Hardly "blanket". It's a temporary ruling and applies only to immigration roundups. Bernardo de La Paz Monday #1
Moreover, such flimsy criteria become routine. An innocent citizen can be subjected to this over and over unblock Monday #2

Bernardo de La Paz

(58,428 posts)
1. Hardly "blanket". It's a temporary ruling and applies only to immigration roundups.
Mon Sep 15, 2025, 02:14 PM
Monday

Still, of course, it is serious. Too early to know if it holds because they likely will rule on a non-emergency appeal expected at some later time. At least this is my understanding of it.

unblock

(55,627 posts)
2. Moreover, such flimsy criteria become routine. An innocent citizen can be subjected to this over and over
Mon Sep 15, 2025, 02:26 PM
Monday

If looking Latino or whatever is enough to justify a stop, then it's enough to justify a stop of the same person the next day and the day after, certainly by different police officers.

Even the same police officer could likely get away with it, oh I didn't recognize you from last month. Can't wait for them to say they all look alike.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Supreme Court's blanket a...