Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(77,792 posts)
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 10:51 PM Sep 2

Exclusive: Justice Amy Coney Barrett defends overturning Roe v. Wade and reveals Supreme Court dynamics in new book

Nothing much new for me from reading this article--she is a dangerous women to families and women IMHO

Exclusive: Justice Amy Coney Barrett defends overturning Roe v. Wade and reveals Supreme Court dynamics in new book

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/02/politics/amy-coney-barrett-book-supreme-court-abortion?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us

By Joan Biskupic , CNN Chief Supreme Court Analyst
18 hr ago

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett in a new memoir defends her vote reversing a half century of national abortion rights, declaring that Roe v. Wade usurped the will of the American people and “came at a cost.”

“(T)he Court’s role is to respect the choices that the people have agreed upon, not to tell them what they should agree to,” Barrett writes in “Listening to the Law,” set to be published on September 9.

CNN obtained access to Barrett’s memoir, in which the justice also takes on religious bias and details her decision-making process, revealing that her chambers once celebrated with champagne when other justices joined a “particularly tricky” opinion of hers.

........................

Her 2020 appointment to the vacancy created by the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg set in motion the 5-4 end of Roe v. Wade.

..........................



She reportedly secured a $2 million advance for her book published on the conservative Sentinel imprint of Penguin Random House. Barrett declined requests from CNN for an interview.


............... So far, the conservative supermajority – which Barrett’s appointment sealed – has provided scant checks on his aggressive agenda. .................................

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exclusive: Justice Amy Coney Barrett defends overturning Roe v. Wade and reveals Supreme Court dynamics in new book (Original Post) riversedge Sep 2 OP
Amy, doing the good christian anti Jesus johnnyfins Sep 2 #1
Making a buck from her SC job. How very respectful of the dignity of the office. Scrivener7 Sep 3 #2
Deeply dangerous, and predictable. Roberts court declared the U.S. has a king. Passages Sep 3 #3

johnnyfins

(2,902 posts)
1. Amy, doing the good christian anti Jesus
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 11:20 PM
Sep 2

Work. You know, given the turmoil around her nomination and confirmation, I wonder why she, as a person of conscience, didn't refuse said nomination.

We all know why. Fucking fraud.

Scrivener7

(57,176 posts)
2. Making a buck from her SC job. How very respectful of the dignity of the office.
Wed Sep 3, 2025, 07:16 AM
Sep 3

I suppose we should be thankful it's not a Winnebago.

Passages

(3,608 posts)
3. Deeply dangerous, and predictable. Roberts court declared the U.S. has a king.
Wed Sep 3, 2025, 09:28 AM
Sep 3

He has just enough votes on this court to keep him empowered.

Abortion Will Not Be Sent Back to the States
Republican jurists invoke democracy in preparing to overturn Roe v. Wade, but democracy functionally doesn’t exist in much of the country.

by Scott Lemieux December 6, 2021
https://prospect.org/justice/abortion-will-not-be-sent-back-to-the-states/

Democracy & Government
Judge Barrett’s Record: Siding With Businesses Over Workers
BY David Dayen | October 15, 2020

*These views have run counter to the civil rights of vulnerable and oppressed people time and again, in ways that suggest that Barrett would be unyieldingly extreme on the Court when it comes to protections for workers, police suspects, and people of color. The implications of some of Barrett’s rulings are truly grave, and whether or not they slow down or derail her confirmation, they should get a full airing in the committee.

Consider EEOC v. AutoZone. Judge Barrett did not write this opinion, but she joined a slim majority that denied a rehearing of the case at the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. AutoZone had a policy in Chicago of segregating employees by race, creating a “Hispanic store” and a “Black store” on the South Side. While employees’ pay, benefits, and job tasks didn’t differ, it did keep them from working at the location of their choice. In the words of the dissent to the majority’s ruling, the court effectively said that “a separate-but-equal arrangement is permissible under Title VII as long as the separate facilities really are equal.”

The implications of the AutoZone case are terrifying. “It’s a case that makes clear that she will put the interests of employers over that of workers,” says Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee. “She will give employers the benefit of the doubt in terms of justifications they put forth for discriminatory policies and practices.” Expanding that out, Barrett could be willing to accept discriminatory actions in a host of other settings, even in the face of rulings like Brown v. Board of Education.
https://billmoyers.com/story/judge-barretts-record-siding-with-businesses-over-workers/

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Exclusive: Justice Amy Co...