Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
DOJ reassigned top attorneys. They quit after feeling sidelined.
WP EXCLUSIVE
DOJ reassigned top attorneysu in. They quit after feeling sidelined.
People familiar with the Sanctuary Cities Enforcement working group say members were assigned menial busy work, and their impression was that the real goal was to force senior career lawyers to resign.
August 30, 2025 at 8:24 a.m. EDT Today at 8:24 a.m. EDT
Attorney General Pam Bondi in June. (Matt McClain/The Washington Post)
By Perry Stein
In the first weeks of the current Trump administration, Justice Department officials gave a select group of top senior career attorneys a choice: They could either quit or go to a newly created Sanctuary Cities Enforcement working group. … About a dozen lawyers from high-profile sections including the civil rights and national security divisions agreed to the transfer, jumping into an area most had no experience with but knew was one of the department’s top priorities.
Six months later, all of those attorneys have left DOJ for good, the last one packing up this week. And five people familiar with the working group say they got the impression that the task force was designed to do nothing but frustrate and eventually force out lawyers the administration felt it could replace with people more loyal to the president.A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment.
The working group’s name may have suggested its members would be helping to challenge “sanctuary city” policies, which municipalities use to limit or prohibit their employees from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement. But instead, the people said, members were asked to do Google-type searches and other menial research on those policies — and were told there was no need to communicate with the lawyers who were actually filing high-profile lawsuits against such jurisdictions as Los Angeles, New York and Denver.
“The assignment was a sham,” said Bonnie Robin-Vergeer, former chief of the Civil Rights Division’s appellate section, who quit after six weeks. “We did very little.”
{snip}
By Perry Stein
Perry Stein covers the Justice Department and FBI for The Washington Post. Send her secure messages on Signal at perrystein.05 follow on X@perrystein
DOJ reassigned top attorneysu in. They quit after feeling sidelined.
People familiar with the Sanctuary Cities Enforcement working group say members were assigned menial busy work, and their impression was that the real goal was to force senior career lawyers to resign.
August 30, 2025 at 8:24 a.m. EDT Today at 8:24 a.m. EDT
Attorney General Pam Bondi in June. (Matt McClain/The Washington Post)
By Perry Stein
In the first weeks of the current Trump administration, Justice Department officials gave a select group of top senior career attorneys a choice: They could either quit or go to a newly created Sanctuary Cities Enforcement working group. … About a dozen lawyers from high-profile sections including the civil rights and national security divisions agreed to the transfer, jumping into an area most had no experience with but knew was one of the department’s top priorities.
Six months later, all of those attorneys have left DOJ for good, the last one packing up this week. And five people familiar with the working group say they got the impression that the task force was designed to do nothing but frustrate and eventually force out lawyers the administration felt it could replace with people more loyal to the president.A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment.
The working group’s name may have suggested its members would be helping to challenge “sanctuary city” policies, which municipalities use to limit or prohibit their employees from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement. But instead, the people said, members were asked to do Google-type searches and other menial research on those policies — and were told there was no need to communicate with the lawyers who were actually filing high-profile lawsuits against such jurisdictions as Los Angeles, New York and Denver.
“The assignment was a sham,” said Bonnie Robin-Vergeer, former chief of the Civil Rights Division’s appellate section, who quit after six weeks. “We did very little.”
{snip}
By Perry Stein
Perry Stein covers the Justice Department and FBI for The Washington Post. Send her secure messages on Signal at perrystein.05 follow on X@perrystein
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
