Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Passages

(3,608 posts)
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 02:29 PM Aug 25

A Federal Appellate Court Finds the NLRB to Be Unconstitutional

And just like that, it frees Elon Musk—and any fellow employers—to violate whatever rights their workers thought they enjoyed.

by Harold Meyerson August 25, 2025


The National Labor Relations Act—that pillar of American democracy that gives workers the right to bargain collectively with their employers—was enacted 90 years ago this summer. Its constitutionality was upheld two years later by the Supreme Court, and no successful challenge to its constitutionality has been brought in the subsequent 88 years. Until last week, when the avowedly far-right Fifth Circuit decided otherwise.

Today, the NLRA hovers somewhere between de facto and de jure nullification. It’s been slowly eroding for at least half a century, as employer resistance to it has heightened, and as the penalties to employers for violating its terms have weakened. Currently, the fact that the five-member National Labor Relations Board is down to just two members—not enough to constitute a quorum—means the Board can make no rulings. This enables employers who’ve been found to have violated workers’ rights by lower NLRB administrative courts to appeal those findings and penalties to the Board, which cannot rule on anything—essentially, giving those employers leeway to keep on doing what they’re doing, however illegal it may be.

More from Harold Meyerson

The Board is only down to two members because President Trump fired Biden-appointed and congressionally confirmed Board chair Gwynne Wilcox in the middle of her term, which, as for all Board members, was set by the NLRA to run for five years. Under the law, presidents had the power to remove members before their terms expire only in the event of “neglect of duty or malfeasance in office,” which Trump didn’t even allege when he fired Wilcox.

https://prospect.org/justice/2025-08-25-federal-appellate-court-finds-nlrb-unconstitutional/

.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Federal Appellate Court Finds the NLRB to Be Unconstitutional (Original Post) Passages Aug 25 OP
Give me a fucking break Jilly_in_VA Aug 25 #1
The J_William_Ryan Aug 25 #2
The good news... littlemissmartypants Sep 3 #3

littlemissmartypants

(29,799 posts)
3. The good news...
Wed Sep 3, 2025, 06:55 AM
Sep 3
Abruzzo, whose service as NLRB general counsel during Biden’s presidency ranks as the most brilliantly pro-worker tenure of any federal official since Sen. Robert Wagner, the NLRA’s author, has some ideas about what can be done if the NLRB remains deactivated or is abolished altogether. “States have to step in,” she told me, “if the NLRB is no longer functioning.” Already, some states have enacted laws banning employers from compelling their employees to listen to anti-union propaganda. Many have extended bargaining rights to workers excluded from the protections of the NLRA. But if the NLRB is no longer functioning and, for instance, can no longer hold union affiliation elections for a company’s workers, then states should consider holding such elections, she suggested. And even if the NLRA is struck down in toto, she noted, workers would still retain their fundamental right to recourse. The years immediately preceding its 1935 enactment, she recalled, were filled with boycotts, strikes, and even general strikes that closed cities down. Workers will “still have the power to withhold their labor,” she said.
https://prospect.org/justice/2025-08-25-federal-appellate-court-finds-nlrb-unconstitutional/
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»A Federal Appellate Court...