'Wow': WSJ editors knife Trump administration's 'out-of-this-world' legal argument
trump's attorneys are claiming that the US is not able to repay the tariffs already collected and that holding trump's tariffs invalid will hurt the country, When trump's DOJ appealed the first ruling, the trump DOJ promised to refund the tariffs if these tariffs were held to be unconstitutional https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220354298
This letter is so sad that the WSJ had fun
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-doj-2673879888/
On Friday, Trump warned on Truth Social that if judges rule against his tariff policy, then a "1929-style" depression would occur in the U.S. The warning shocked the WSJ's editorial board.
"Wow. Ending a tax increase means depression. Who knew?" the editorial board wrote.
The board was also shocked to see Trump's lawyers repeat Trump's logic in court.
"Thats the out-of-this-world argument that Solicitor General John Sauer and Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate made this week in a letter to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit," the editorial reads in part. "The judges must give the President unilateral power to impose tariffs on any country at any time, or the end is nigh."

LetMyPeopleVote
(169,851 posts)This letter is so bad that it is funny. The idiot attorney who sent this letter deserves to be mocked and laughed at.
As if Trumpâs actions couldnât get any more embarrassing https://www.dailykos.com/story/2025/8/12/2337983/-As-if-Trump-s-actions-couldn-t-get-any-more-embarrassing?pm_campaign=blog&pm_medium=rss&pm_source=
— Fighting Liberal Texas Demðððð¦Congress Switchboard 202-224-3121 (@fightingliberal.bsky.social) 2025-08-13T02:22:18.504217Z
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/8/12/2337983/-As-if-Trump-s-actions-couldn-t-get-any-more-embarrassing
In a letter urging the Supreme Court to uphold Trumps supposed right to impose tariffseven though the Constitution gives that power to CongressSauer outdoes himself in presidential flattery.
On July 27, after stating his intention to impose IEEPA tariffs, President Trump announced the largest trade agreement in history with the 27-nation European Union, Americas most significant trading partner.
Thats wrong on several counts. The EU is the United States second-largest trading partner, behind Canada. And there is no largest trade agreement in history. What Trump announced was a framework, not a binding treaty. These agreements take years to finalize, often require congressional approval, and must be ratified by EU members. None of that has happened......
Sauers letter goes on:
Suddenly revoking the Presidents tariff authority under IEEPA would have catastrophic consequences for our national security, foreign policy, and economy. The President believes that our country would not be able to pay back the trillions of dollars that other countries have already committed to pay, which could lead to financial ruin.
If Trumps actions are illegal, downstream consequences are irrelevant. If he believes having this power is vital, Congress can give it to him. What the president believes is not legal authority, precedent, or statute. Trump believes many things that are simply wrong. And, no, other countries have not committed to pay trillions to the United States. At best, theyve made vague investment pledges that rarely materialize.......
Finally, Sauer warns:
If the United States were forced to unwind these historic agreements, the President believes that a forced dissolution of the agreements could lead to a 1929-style result. In such a scenario, people would be forced from their homes, millions of jobs would be eliminated, hard-working Americans would lose their savings, and even Social Security and Medicare could be threatened. In short, the economic consequences would be ruinous, instead of unprecedented success.
Social Security and Medicare are more threatened by GOP hostility than by losing Trumps tariffs. They were fine before his trade war, and he has never claimed tariffs were critical to their survival. If unwinding these agreements happens, it will be because Trump broke the law.