Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(128,722 posts)
Mon Aug 11, 2025, 02:57 PM Aug 11

White House could break Congress with more recissions

By David A. Super / Los Angeles Times

Having prevailed in mid-July on party-line congressional votes to slash foreign assistance and zero-out public broadcasting, senior Trump administration officials immediately signaled intent to seek still more “rescissions” of money already appropriated for the current fiscal year.

Even more provocatively, they are discussing plans to engage in the cuts by flagrantly sidestepping Congress. All this comes against a backdrop of the administration’s quiet withholding or slow-walking of billions of dollars for programs ranging from Head Start to medical research.

This mad rush to defund public programs is deeply irresponsible. These programs serve real purposes that the administration has ignored in its haste to slash domestic spending. Comedians poked fun at Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency when it had to scramble to rehire the fired workers who keep our nuclear weapons safe. This willful ignorance took a tragic turn when the National Weather Service’s Texas offices were left understaffed as catastrophic flooding and hurricane season approached. The Lancet medical journal published a study finding that the administration’s rapid-fire foreign aid cuts will lead to 14 million preventable deaths by 2030 if they continue.

The White House defunding marathon is also illegal. President Nixon tried very much the same thing, withholding appropriated funds from programs he disliked. Every court that considered the merits of his impoundments found them unlawful, including a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court. The president can veto spending legislation he finds excessive, but he may not sign an appropriations act and then simply refuse to implement it or appropriations signed into law before his administration.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/comment-white-house-could-break-congress-with-more-recissions/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House could break Congress with more recissions (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 11 OP
Sure. Why not? Congress won't fight him and SCOTUS won't stop him. hedda_foil Aug 11 #1
And therein lies the problem. slightlv Aug 11 #2

slightlv

(6,563 posts)
2. And therein lies the problem.
Mon Aug 11, 2025, 05:07 PM
Aug 11

In the days of Nixon, we still have a functional judicial system. Although Ford should never have been allowed to pardon Nixon. It set a bad precedent that the repugs have been pushing ever since. So today, trump purposely broke it, first chance he got, as the only restraint on his unimagined power grab. SCOTUS wasn't overtly political until the days of bush, but trump with McConnell's help, threw away all rules, constitutional or traditional. IMO, "turtle" ought to be held as accountable for treason as trump should be.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»White House could break C...