Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Passages

(3,608 posts)
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 09:35 AM Aug 1

'Clinton Plan' Emails Were Likely Made by Russian Spies, Declassified Report Shows

An annex to a report by the special counsel John H. Durham was the latest in a series of disclosures about the Russia inquiry, as the Trump team seeks to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein files.

Adam Goldman
By Charlie Savage and Adam Goldman
Reporting from Washington

Published July 31, 2025
Updated Aug. 1, 2025, 8:55 a.m. ET

The Trump-era special counsel who scoured the Russia investigation for wrongdoing gathered evidence that undermines a theory pushed by some Republicans that Hillary Clinton’s campaign conspired to frame Donald J. Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election, information declassified on Thursday shows.

The information, a 29-page annex to the special counsel’s 2023 report, reveals that a foundational document for that theory was most likely stitched together by Russian spies. The document is a purported email from July 27, 2016, that said Mrs. Clinton had approved a campaign proposal to tie Mr. Trump to Russia to distract from the scandal over her use of a private email server.

The release of the annex adds new details to the public’s understanding of a complex trove of 2016 Russian intelligence reports analyzing purported emails that Russian hackers stole from Americans. It also shows how the special counsel, John H. Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the emails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise.

snip*
In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Mrs. Clinton approved a plan to tie Mr. Trump to Russia is not credible: Mr. Durham concluded that the email from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/31/us/politics/trump-clinton-emails-russia-investigation.html?unlocked_article_code=1.a08.WmHr.TWoZEuTvFEKm&smid=url-share




7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

viva la

(4,296 posts)
1. The Trump minion said this "annex" implicated Obama et al. in forgery
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 09:44 AM
Aug 1

In fact, it's the opposite.

It's like what Bill Barr did with the Mueller report-- went out and reported it didn't implicate Russia and Trump, when it did. But he got out first and "Translated" it.

Same thing here.
Trump murders truth.

marble falls

(68,605 posts)
3. Asked how he won his battles, Gen Bedford Forrest said battles are won by he "who arrives firstest with the mostest." ..
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 09:54 AM
Aug 1

... Gen Forrest also founded the Klu Klux Klan.

I bet Bill Burr has a picture of Bedford Forrest on his desk.


Baitball Blogger

(50,927 posts)
4. That's probably why the Republicans were so insistent about getting to Clinton's emails.
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 09:54 AM
Aug 1

They knew the planted emails were there and hoped to implicate her. Co-conspirators with the Russians.

underpants

(193,046 posts)
5. God, RWers on X think this is the Holy Grail. I read it as just a campaign decision
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 09:57 AM
Aug 1

I plastered this everywhere on X

emulatorloo

(46,130 posts)
6. But It isn't a 'campaign decision'. It is a Russian Lie - fabricated emails about a campaign decision
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 12:31 PM
Aug 1

So of course Grassley, Patel and Trump are happy to promote a Russian lie as TRUE.

underpants

(193,046 posts)
7. Before I'd seen this I'd just read it as it is.
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 12:43 PM
Aug 1

To me it just looked like she (the campaign) decided to highlight it or at least keep planting it. That’s how I read it. Now I know why Durham didn’t put it in the actual report

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»'Clinton Plan' Emails Wer...