Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(122,128 posts)
Mon Feb 17, 2025, 05:15 PM Feb 17

Trump is chasing off lawyers he'll need at some point

By Ross Douthat / The New York Times

It was easy to predict that a diktat from Donald Trump’s Justice Department would, at some point in his second term, prompt resignations from career prosecutors with conservative legal bona fides. Given Trump’s crude transactionalism and his administration’s determination to reshape the boundaries of executive power, it was always likely that we’d get some version of the conflict now pitting Trump’s acting deputy attorney general, Emil Bove, against Danielle Sassoon and the other prosecutors in the Southern District of New York.

It is extremely surprising, however, that the conflict would be sought and stoked just weeks into Trump’s four-year term, and for the sake of protecting Eric Adams, a Democratic mayor of a liberal city with just 11 months left in his term of office.

The Trump Department of Justice is picking a fight with its own lawyers, not for some long-standing desire of the president’s heart nor over some important point of constitutional interpretation, but to keep an official of the rival party, with no obvious political future, in office for a very short time. And to the extent that there appears to be any quid pro quo at work, as the Manhattan Institute’s Charles Fain Lehman points out, all the Trump administration is getting from Adams is a promise to enforce existing immigration law — which given his myriad difficulties and limited tenure, is probably not worth very much.

The assumption inside the Trump administration, one supposes, is that it’s better to cull the potentially disloyal lawyers early, or to get them to prove their allegiance upfront, so that you won’t have to worry about dramatic resignations when you come to some much more important battle. Adams isn’t important in his own right; he’s just a useful test of obedience and discipline.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/douthat-trump-is-chasing-off-lawyers-hell-need-at-some-point/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump is chasing off lawyers he'll need at some point (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 17 OP
As of today, 74 lawsuits have been filed against the Trump/Musk administration, Ocelot II Feb 17 #1

Ocelot II

(124,388 posts)
1. As of today, 74 lawsuits have been filed against the Trump/Musk administration,
Mon Feb 17, 2025, 05:25 PM
Feb 17

and lawyers employed by DoJ are going to have to defend them. If DOGE keeps firing lawyers, or if they keep doing heinous things that cause a lot of lawyers to quit, who is going to handle all those cases? These are civil cases, not criminal prosecutions, and they'll need lawyers who understand not only the substantive law on which the cases are based, but also administrative law and the Administrative Procedure Act. Will they have them? Or will they have to rely on the remaining overworked junior lawyers who haven't been fired yet and lack either the expertise or/and the time to do the work? The plaintiffs have experienced lawyers from state AGs' offices and organizations like the ACLU, and I'm hoping, at least, that the DoJ lawyers who are left won't be able to keep up. I used to think the DoJ had the cream of the legal crop, but not any more.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Trump is chasing off lawy...