In their own words: What Trump said about Gaza and how top administration officials contradicted him
WASHINGTON (AP) Top Trump administration voices on Wednesday contradicted some of the comments the president made a day earlier about the U.S. taking long-term control of war-shattered Gaza, the possibility of sending in American troops and the areas residents being permanently resettled.
President Donald Trump s remarks Tuesday set off alarm in Arab countries and even among some of his Republican allies before Secretary of State Marco Rubio and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt tried to walk them back.
Heres a look at what Trump, Rubio and Leavitt said, and the key areas in which they disagree:
https://apnews.com/article/trump-rubio-leavitt-gaza-permanent-temporary-funding-53d3c737d24dd8ea290e0e7962546575

LetMyPeopleVote
(162,166 posts)After having learned nothing after his first failed term, the president still appears wholly incapable of avoiding shambolic chaos of his own making.
https://bsky.app/profile/stevebenen.com/post/3lhjax7bnhs2r
Take his Gaza "plan," for example.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-details-make-trumps-radical-gaza-plan-look-worse-not-better-rcna190962
Nearly six years later, the assessment continues to ring true. Take the presidents plan Im using the word loosely to acquire the Gaza Strip......
As for how, exactly, the president arrived at this idea, The New York Times reported that Trump shocked even senior members of his own White House on Tuesday afternoon:
[P]rivately, Mr. Trump had been talking about U.S. ownership of the enclave for weeks. And his thinking had accelerated, according to two administration officials, after his Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, returned from Gaza last week and described the horrific conditions there.
While his announcement looked formal and thought-out he read the plan from a sheet of paper his administration had not done even the most basic planning to examine the feasibility of the idea, according to four people with knowledge of the discussions, who were not authorized to speak publicly.
In a normal, functioning U.S. administration, such a monumental decision would go through months of intense scrutiny, led by experienced national security and diplomatic officials. There would be working groups. And negotiations. And detailed analyses on costs and consequences......
The day after the rollout of the plan, administration officials couldnt answer the questions because there were no such answers. All they had were some poorly thought-out rhetoric that their boss blurted out, to the consternation of much of the planet.
After a day of confusion at the White House, Trump apparently thought he could help clear things up with a 107-word missive published to his social media platform. In it, the Republican said Gaza would be turned over to the United States, and Palestinians would be resettled in some other countries that he didnt identify.
He went on to say that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who is Jewish, is a Palestinian a label Trump has long used as a slur before concluding that Trump doesnt believe U.S. troops will be needed as part of this endeavor because ... well, he never actually got around to saying why not.
All of which is to say, Trump created an avoidable international incident on Tuesday, only to make matters worse soon after.