Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(174,223 posts)
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 05:15 AM 4 hrs ago

Federal government proposes to lessen nuclear reactor environmental reviews

Source: The Hill

07/09/26 5:34 PM ET


A key government agency is proposing to lessen the scope of environmental reviews for nuclear reactors, limiting public input and exempting some reactors altogether. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on Wednesday announced that it is narrowing review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), a bedrock environmental law.

This includes exempting reviews of some activities altogether, including the reapproval of existing reactors, as well as some new reactors. For other projects, the agency will still review radiological impacts — but it is proposing to no longer consider factors such as dust, noise and air pollution that it says are beyond its scope.

NRC Chair Ho Nieh also said that the agency is also proposing to no longer issue draft environmental reviews, limiting the public’s ability to weigh in to the start of the process before the environmental impacts are considered.

Nieh described the move in a written statement as “concentrating on impacts the NRC can address,” adding that it would “strengthen environmental protection while making licensing reviews more timely and predictable.” However, Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said that the move takes away an education tool for the public.

Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5961792-nrc-nepa-nuclear-power/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal government proposes to lessen nuclear reactor environmental reviews (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 4 hrs ago OP
The federal government Whip-poor-will 3 hrs ago #1
what is wrong with these people? rampartd 3 hrs ago #2
What could Chernobably go wrong? Ocelot II 41 min ago #3
Fast Tracking THE MOST EXPENSIVE modrepub 40 min ago #4
Of course they are. sinkingfeeling 34 min ago #5
What could possibly go wrong? RexLipton 29 min ago #6

Whip-poor-will

(700 posts)
1. The federal government
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 05:24 AM
3 hrs ago

The republican government led by a child rapist is the federal governmant at this point

rampartd

(5,832 posts)
2. what is wrong with these people?
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 05:38 AM
3 hrs ago

they aren't worried about measles or screw worms or cancer or nuclear leaks but unless they are surrounded by gold and green paper they will melt?

it is a modern "glass delusion"

modrepub

(4,276 posts)
4. Fast Tracking THE MOST EXPENSIVE
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 08:42 AM
40 min ago

Way to produce electricity out there. Guess who gets to pay for it. That’s right, all of us.

Yea, there are safety concerns but getting saddled with 50+ years of increased electricity rates is 100% certain for those with one of these on your grid. I estimate nuclear electricity is currently 35-40 times more expensive than that produced by combined cycle natural gas plants (the cheapest form of production now).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal government propos...