Postmaster general's remarks on mail ballots stoke fears among voting rights advocates
Source: The Hill
06/28/26 6:00 AM ET
Postmaster General David Steiner stoked fears among Democrats and voting rights groups this week after confirming the U.S. Postal Service will no longer deliver mail ballots in states that refuse to provide sensitive voter data to the federal government.
The Trump administrations crackdown on mail-in voting is becoming a point of contention ahead of Novembers general election. Critics have sounded the alarm on what they call the federal governments attempt to overstep its authority. Some courts have agreed. A federal judge on Thursday blocked the proposal from moving forward after a slate of Democratic-led states filed a lawsuit.
Celina Stewart, chief executive officer of the League of Women Voters, said the postmaster generals statement creates a credibility issue.
The comments that he made are particularly concerning because voting is a right, and now its being presented as like this risk profile, and when access to the ballot starts being treated as suspicious behavior, which I think is the underlying thing here, democracy itself starts to be audited, I think, which is really problematic, Stewart said. And if we think about why the Postal Service exists, its to serve the public, not to serve as a data pipeline for political agendas.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5943390-usps-mail-ballots-trump-order-voter-data/
BonnieJW
(3,158 posts)Preventing the usps from implementing this plan. I will look for a link.
hookaleft
(1,426 posts)snip>
But perhaps the most important of this weeks pro-voting rulings came Thursday, when, as Jacob Knutson reported, a judge blocked the government from implementing Trumps March executive order that aimed to crack down on mail voting.
The decision could hardly have been more timely it came just a day after the Postmaster General alarmingly told lawmakers that the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) wouldnt deliver mail ballots in states that dont first submit a list of would-be mail voters to be checked against government records, as Trumps order envisions. One USPS advocate told Jacob that the plan, by turning the nonpartisan agency into a political tool of the administration, will destroy the Postal Service.
Indeed, Jim explained why, despite Thursdays crucial ruling, voting rights advocates aware of this administrations record of finding ways around, or flat-out ignoring, court orders arent declaring victory just yet.
snip>
https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/this-week-at-democracy-docket-judges-are-rejecting-trumps-anti-voting-crusade/
BaronChocula
(4,980 posts)Not "Voting rights advocates on alert" or "Voting rights advocates fight back."
Voting rights advocates/progressives aren't cowering in the corner. They're Ginger Rogers on the damn dance floor.
The Friggin' Hill.
https://www.npr.org/2026/06/25/nx-s1-5869755/judge-blocks-postal-service-proposal-to-restrict-mail-in-voting-under-trumps-order