Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,917 posts)
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 07:46 AM 8 hrs ago

USPS proposal could halt ballot deliveries to states that don't share voter lists

Source: KGW-TV Portland, OR

Published: 7:01 PM PDT June 10, 2026
Updated: 7:02 PM PDT June 10, 2026


PORTLAND, Ore. — Oregon leaders are pushing back against a proposed U.S. Postal Service rule that would require states to share voter registration lists and ballot-tracking barcode information with the agency in order to ensure mail ballot delivery. The Postal Service says the proposal is intended to comply with an executive order signed by President Donald Trump in March, ostensibly aimed at strengthening election integrity and oversight of mail voting.

But Oregon officials argue election administration should remain under state control. "It's incredibly bizarre to take a postal service — that their job is to deliver mail — and then tell them, 'You can't deliver mail to certain people,'" Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said. Rayfield was responding to a proposal that would allow the U.S. Postal Service to consider withholding ballot delivery in states that refuse to provide voter registration information to the agency.

The proposal has raised concerns among some Oregon voters. "They want more excuses to be able to silence the concerns voters have," one man in downtown Portland said."My concern is what they do with it," a woman added. Another said, "The strategy of the Trump government is to get it to the Supreme Court, which they have stacked.". Gov. Tina Kotek also criticized the proposal, saying voting rights must be protected.

"Every voter in Oregon and across the country has the right to a free, fair and equal say in our democracy, and we must stand together to keep that promise," Kotek said in a statement provided to KGW on Wednesday. The Postal Service maintains it is following the president's executive order. Trump has said the effort is intended to protect "voter integrity.". Rayfield and attorneys general from 22 other states have filed a lawsuit seeking to block the order.

Read more: https://www.kgw.com/article/news/politics/elections/usps-proposal-could-block-ballots/283-2c3dd2fd-ef29-4873-9642-8fcaea1dd022



Link to proposed RULE (Federal Register) (PDF) - https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-10968.pdf

NOTABLE ILLEGAL SECTION

(snip)

Pre-Election Notification of Intent to Use Postal System for Ballot Delivery

• DMM 705.24.2 would provide for an optional pre-mailing notice that states
may provide to the Postal Service, and facilitate the process for states to
enroll individuals with the Postal Service for inclusion on state-specific lists
for mail-in and absentee ballot participation.

This provision would allow states to notify the Postal Service of their intent to use
the mail to facilitate their election processes. By disclosing relevant points of
contact, it will allow the Postal Service to more expeditiously provide technical
and other assistance in advance of the election. It will also facilitate the adoption
of the new elements of ballot mailing that are proposed in this regulation.

Mail-In and Absentee Participation List

• DMM 705.24.4 would establish a process by which (1) states (including
authorized election officials and their mail service providers) will notify the
Postal Service of the individuals to whom they are mailing a mail-in or
absentee ballot, along with the unique barcode applied to the outbound
and return ballot mail envelope for such individuals such that the name
and barcode of the voter will be included on a Mail-In and Absentee
Participation List; (2) states (including authorized election officials and
their mail service providers) may thereafter add to or modify the list of
enrollees until the last day that ballots may be mailed out to individuals
under state law; and (3) the Postal Service will provide to each state’s
chief election official a final State-Specific Mail-In and Absentee
Participation List for each state compiling the names of all enrolled
individuals in such state, along with the barcodes associated with such
individuals’ mail-in or absentee ballots.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
USPS proposal could halt ballot deliveries to states that don't share voter lists (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago OP
The Federal government can't control state elections! Chasstev365 8 hrs ago #1
Then to be fast tracked to the most corrupt SCOTUS ever! PuraVidaDreamin 7 hrs ago #5
USPS is not a political tool bucolic_frolic 8 hrs ago #2
Since T and Dejoy dismantled the bulk of it Hope22 7 hrs ago #6
I thought elections were up to the states.................... Lovie777 8 hrs ago #3
I do not see any way that this can be videohead5 8 hrs ago #4
This is blatantly unconstitutional! DemocracyForever 1 hr ago #7
DeJoy left last year (March 2025) BumRushDaShow 1 hr ago #8
Thanks for the correction DemocracyForever 1 hr ago #9

Chasstev365

(8,288 posts)
1. The Federal government can't control state elections!
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 07:54 AM
8 hrs ago

Get an emergency hearing in front of a judge to dismiss this Bull Shit NOW!

Also, the Biden administration should have dismissed Louis De Joy buy any means possible when they were in power.

PuraVidaDreamin

(4,722 posts)
5. Then to be fast tracked to the most corrupt SCOTUS ever!
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 08:14 AM
7 hrs ago

Knew it was going to get nasty ugly fast.

That's all I know-,
I'm sure they have dirtier tricks up their sleeves.

Hope22

(4,941 posts)
6. Since T and Dejoy dismantled the bulk of it
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 09:10 AM
7 hrs ago

I would call it political. The USPS has stated that they do not want to handle election ballots. I find that political. I have zero desire to stand in line waiting to vote amongst diseased people. Immune compromised and mobility limited people should not have their voting process tampered with to manipulate voter participation for Republicans. So funny the R’s run everything in my red state yet they are the ones who cry about the rigged system they control!

Lovie777

(24,108 posts)
3. I thought elections were up to the states....................
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 08:07 AM
8 hrs ago

why is the federal government interfering with state rights? I mean Republicans have been screaming state rights for decades, now this?

videohead5

(3,019 posts)
4. I do not see any way that this can be
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 08:10 AM
8 hrs ago

Last edited Thu Jun 11, 2026, 10:41 AM - Edit history (1)

Constitutional. It's interfering with states rights. The states control the voting.

DemocracyForever

(266 posts)
7. This is blatantly unconstitutional!
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 02:23 PM
1 hr ago

According to the U.S. constitution, the executive branch has no role in elections so Trump's executive order is unconstitutional and a blatant abuse of power. The Postal Service is a separate entity from the federal government. It's disturbing that DeJoy is willing to do unconstitutional things to curry favor with Trump. The U.S. constitution gives the states the authority to conduct elections NOT the executive branch. It's interesting that the media seems to be incapable of reporting these crucial facts about the constitution.

DemocracyForever

(266 posts)
9. Thanks for the correction
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 03:03 PM
1 hr ago

I don't ever remember hearing that DeJoy had left. The bottom line is that the Postal Service behavior and the Trump executive order are blatantly unconstitutional.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»USPS proposal could halt ...