SPLC Files Motion Arguing Vindictive Prosecution by Department of Justice
Source: SPLC
SPLC Files Motion Arguing Vindictive Prosecution by Department of Justice
May 26, 2026
Motion seeks dismissal of all charges against SPLC by the court
MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- Today, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) filed a motion in federal court to dismiss the charges against the SPLC based on vindictive prosecution. The motion argues that the charges brought against the 55-year old civil rights organization are the result of targeting by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and amount to retaliation, violating the SPLC's constitutional right to due process.
Citing statements and actions by President Trump, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, other high ranking DOJ officials and FBI Director Kash Patel, the SPLC posits that the charges against it were brought not because of any criminal activity, but because the SPLC has been critical of the Administration's policies and has published about extremist views held by Administration officials. According to the motion, the SPLC's advocacy work and its reporting on hate and extremism are protected by the First Amendment; disseminating the SPLC's research is public education and among the landmark work for which the organization is known.
"For weeks, we have been arguing against these false allegations levied against the SPLC -- an organization that for 55 years has stood as a beacon of hope fighting white supremacy and various forms of injustice to create a multiracial democracy where we can all live and thrive," said Bryan Fair, interim president and CEO, SPLC. "The government can't prosecute the SPLC as payback for its protected speech -- it violates basic constitutional rights."
Some statements highlighted in the motion, like Blanche's false claim that there was not evidence the SPLC passed information to law enforcement in efforts to thwart the criminal activities of hate groups--which the prosecution in the case has conceded was untrue and that Blanche later corrected-- have also been the subject of other motions the SPLC has made showing how this prosecution is improper.
{snip}
Read more: https://www.splcenter.org/presscenter/motion-vindictive-prosecution-department-justice/
Reposted by Evil, Corrupt, and Weaponized Popehat
https://app.staging.bsky.dev/profile/kenwhite.bsky.social
******
Adam Klasfeld
@klasfeldreports.com
NEWS
The SPLC has moved to DISMISS its indictment for vindictive prosecution, kicking off its legal brief with Trump's "triumphant" statement three days after its charges were unsealed.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.almd.90265/gov.uscourts.almd.90265.49.1_1.pdf
5:23 PM · May 26, 2026
******
https://app.staging.bsky.dev/profile/klasfeldreports.com/post/3mmrwgxsvls23
******
Adam Klasfeld
@klasfeldreports.com
NOTABLE:
The SPLC alerts a federal judge in a footnote of its vindictive prosecution motion to the Trump Justice Department's grand jury misconduct in the Broadview Six case, arguing that it's another reason for sunlight on the sealed transcripts.
5:41 PM · May 26, 2026
******
https://app.staging.bsky.dev/profile/klasfeldreports.com/post/3mmrxicbnf22t
hedda_foil
(17,029 posts)Get the charges dropped, then sue the government for their malicious prosecution.
LetMyPeopleVote
(182,455 posts)This prosecution is clearly vindictive and should be dismissed
Link to tweet
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/southern-poverty-law-center-seeks-dismissal-criminal-charges-vindictive/
The 47-page filing in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama documents a series of public statements by the president and other top administration officials targeting the center, including one in which Mr. Trump called it "one of the greatest political scams in American History."
"This is the very definition of a vindictive prosecution," lawyers for the SPLC wrote. "The Court should dismiss the indictment as a violation of due process."
The Justice Department secured an 11-count indictment in April, charging the civil rights nonprofit with wire fraud and bank fraud. The indictment alleges that the group, which is best known for its work to oppose the Ku Klux Klan, lied to donors about paying confidential informants to infiltrate hate groups and deceived banks about the bank accounts used to make those payments....
Numerous former federal prosecutors have publicly weighed in on the indictment against the SPLC, saying it appears to be weak and has a likely chance of being dismissed due to a variety of legal defects with how the case is charged.
In the group's motion to dismiss the charges on Tuesday, its lawyers noted that investigators from the FBI and IRS probed the organization and interviewed several people sometime between 2019 and 2020, but never sought criminal charges.
maxsolomon
(39,174 posts)I suggest requesting 1.776 billion.
mahatmakanejeeves
(70,936 posts)Reposted by Popehat Has Gone Absolutely CRAZY!!!
https://bsky.app/profile/kenwhite.bsky.social
@michaelehayden.bsky.social
It sure looks like MAGA started to focus on the SPLC for potential prosecution right around the time my story about Stephen Miller's private emails published. (End of 2019.)
I'm sure it's a total coincidence!
11:16 AM · May 27, 2026
It sure looks like MAGA started to focus on the SPLC for potential prosecution right around the time my story about Stephen Miller's private emails published. (End of 2019.)
— Michael Edison Hayden (@michaelehayden.bsky.social) 2026-05-27T15:16:18.639Z
I'm sure it's a total coincidence!