Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,109 posts)
Sat May 16, 2026, 06:45 AM 4 hrs ago

Consumers sue Amazon for not refunding Trump tariff costs

Source: Reuters

May 15, 2026 8:20 PM EDT Updated 10 hours ago


May 15 (Reuters) - Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) was sued on Friday by consumers seeking refunds for costs passed on to them in the form of higher prices as a result ​of tariffs the U.S. Supreme Court later concluded had been unlawfully imposed by President ‌Donald Trump.

Consumers in a proposed class action filed in federal court in Seattle alleged that the e-commerce giant collected hundreds of millions of dollars in unlawful tariff costs by raising prices on imported goods ​before the Supreme Court had ruled. The U.S. Supreme Court in February concluded in a ​6-3 decision that Trump overstepped his authority by using the International Emergency ⁠Economic Powers Act to impose his sweeping tariffs.

Thousands of companies have begun to ​seek billions of dollars in refunds from the government following the ruling. But Amazon has not, ​which the lawsuit alleged was "not because it lacks a legal basis to do so, but because it seeks to curry favor with Trump by allowing the federal government to retain the funds."

"The problem is ​that the funds Amazon is using to stay in the President's good graces do ​not belong to Amazon,” the lawsuit says. "These funds were wrongfully taken from consumers to cover IEEPA Tariffs ‌that ⁠have since been invalidated.". The lawsuit asserts claims of unjust enrichment and violation of Washington state's consumer-protection law. Amazon did not respond to a request for comment.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/consumers-sue-amazon-not-refunding-trump-tariff-costs-2026-05-16/



Link to SUIT (PDF) - https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/lbpgyxqwrpq/05152026amazon.pdf
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Consumers sue Amazon for not refunding Trump tariff costs (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 4 hrs ago OP
Fuck Bezos. SergeStorms 3 hrs ago #1
they have all the info at their fingertips. mopinko 3 hrs ago #2
Behind every great fortune is a great crime... dlk 3 hrs ago #3
I will get my cut The Madcap 3 hrs ago #4
It was going to be a mess from the start... paleotn 3 hrs ago #5
What upsets me is they will probably set a court date in 2027.... JohnnyRingo 2 hrs ago #6
Appeal after settling? Tben 59 min ago #10
Good. Bezos and Amazon need to be taxed BIGLY! Joinfortmill 2 hrs ago #7
What chaps my ass (what an odd expressession!) ... 70sEraVet 1 hr ago #8
Let's say $376B has been raised in tariffs* Danascot 1 hr ago #9
Never Going Anywhere. ColoringFool 23 min ago #11

SergeStorms

(20,801 posts)
1. Fuck Bezos.
Sat May 16, 2026, 07:55 AM
3 hrs ago

What a freaking worm.

Sorry about my language, but Bezos really pisses me off! After all, it was his customers who actually paid for that abomination of a mockumentary about Melanoma, too.

The Madcap

(2,026 posts)
4. I will get my cut
Sat May 16, 2026, 08:33 AM
3 hrs ago

by eliminating Amazon from my shopping sources.

By not buying, I'll eventually recoup what I've spent. I'm deliberately trying to avoid spending on anything but absolute necessities at this point.

paleotn

(22,669 posts)
5. It was going to be a mess from the start...
Sat May 16, 2026, 08:33 AM
3 hrs ago

Figuring out who actually paid the tariff, and how much of the tariff, as it was passed down the supply chain like a hot potato, is damn near impossible. A lot of vendors simply added a tariff surcharge based on a guess or no guess at all of the impact. How much of that is actual tariff or tariff gouging is move complicated than the Gordian Knot.

Trying to unravel it will cause even more trouble. Just chock it up to Trump stupidity and use the revenue to pay down the national debt.

JohnnyRingo

(20,988 posts)
6. What upsets me is they will probably set a court date in 2027....
Sat May 16, 2026, 08:56 AM
2 hrs ago

...and it will go from there. Amazon will drag it out saying a year wasn't enough to prepare and push the second date back to sometime in 2028 or later. Then one delay after another and it may be settled around five years from now..... Then Amazon will appeal.

All this time the class action lawyers are piling up billable hours to take off the top of the settlement. I'll probably get $3.00 off a Kindle eBook.

Could it be because most judges only work one or two days a week?

Tben

(4 posts)
10. Appeal after settling?
Sat May 16, 2026, 10:42 AM
59 min ago

A settlement is a legal agreement that binds all parties. In only the rarest of cases could there be an appeal after settlement.

70sEraVet

(5,608 posts)
8. What chaps my ass (what an odd expressession!) ...
Sat May 16, 2026, 09:51 AM
1 hr ago

is that companies passed the cost of tariffs on to the consumers (which is justified), but after the tariffs were lifted the costs DIDN'T GO BACK DOWN!!

Danascot

(5,288 posts)
9. Let's say $376B has been raised in tariffs*
Sat May 16, 2026, 09:56 AM
1 hr ago

The number of US households is about 134M. That's works out to about $2,800 per household. That could be returned as a rebate to each household. Distributing it directly to each household would avoid years of litigation and legal fees, and complex mechanisms in administration of a more complicated scheme, plus most people could really use the money right about now.

*Tariff collection figures: https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/tariff-tracker/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Consumers sue Amazon for ...