Southern Poverty Law Center seeks disclosure of grand jury transcripts in criminal case
Source: CBS News
April 28, 2026 / 10:29 AM EDT
Washington The Southern Poverty Law Center moved to force the disclosure of grand jury materials in the criminal case against the organization, citing what it said were "misleading" statements from Trump administration officials in the aftermath of the indictment last week and "obvious legal infirmities" in court filings.
The filings come after a federal grand jury in Alabama indicted the group on 11 counts of wire and bank fraud-related charges last week. The Justice Department accused the group of paying members of extremist groups as part of its efforts to investigate them without disclosing the practice to donors or banks. The SPLC is a nonprofit that tracks white supremacist and other hate groups across the U.S., and has been a frequent target of President Trump's allies. It has denied the allegations.
"This indictment represents a stunning and unremitting departure from Justice Department policy and established law," attorneys representing the SPLC said in a motion filed Tuesday. "It seeks to criminalize some of the very investigative tools and programs that the SPLC has used for decades to infiltrate and dismantle violent extremist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan and the Aryan Nations tradecraft that has produced vital intelligence that has been shared with law enforcement, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation."
Attorneys representing the group argued that the indictment omits elements of criminal intent, and said that a motion to dismiss the case is "forthcoming.". "These particularized irregularities suggest that the grand jury was not merely misled by the government's presentation of the law, but likely that it was actively weaponized to facilitate such charges," the SPLC said.
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/southern-poverty-law-center-seeks-disclosure-of-grand-jury-transcripts-in-criminal-case/
Link to FILING (PDF) - https://www.splcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/us-splc-motion-disclosure-grand-jury-transcript.pdf
-misanthroptimist
(1,838 posts)...for this Administration to slither under.
pfitz59
(12,974 posts)at the highest levels. Isn't it obvious?
Bev54
(13,527 posts)They are so effing shady.
multigraincracker
(38,108 posts)this fall the DOJ is in big trouble.
vote and donate
Bev54
(13,527 posts)multigraincracker
(38,108 posts)marshall
(6,708 posts)They need to go after those people.
LetMyPeopleVote
(182,455 posts)Judges and grand juries have increasingly lost faith in the Justice Department as the president uses it to reward his friends and go after his opponents.
Link to tweet
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/26/us/politics/trump-justice-department-grand-juries.html?unlocked_article_code=1.lVA.VQWU.zHLKWrAqZOCg&smid=bs-share
The latest setback came in Chicago, where a judge cited a remarkable list of grand jury errors in a case that was dismissed against four Democratic activists about to face trial for impeding the police during a protest last fall at a suburban immigration detention facility.....
The prosecutors also stacked the deck in their own favor by removing from the panel some grand jurors who had voted against them when considering an earlier version of the charges. Making matters even worse, they tried to hide these maneuvers by redacting the grand jury transcripts that is, until Judge Perry ordered them to give her the full copies.
The governments missteps were bad enough to necessitate tossing out the case against the critics of the presidents immigration plan just days before it was supposed to go to trial.....
There are almost no statistics that gauge how often prosecutors fail to secure indictments or are chastised by judges because of their grand jury presentations, if only because such events used to be rare. Legal experts say it is just as uncommon for jurists like Judge Perry to shine a spotlight on grand jury proceedings, which are held in secret, although that, too, has been happening more often.
Barbara L. McQuade, the former U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, said that in her 20 years in the Justice Department, she had never worked on a case or even heard of one in which a judge had examined grand jury transcripts because of concerns about misconduct.
Courts almost never do that, mostly because they trust that the government is acting honestly, Ms. McQuade said. But if the department demonstrates that it isnt worthy of that trust, then it invites judges to look under the hood.....
Part of the problem, legal experts say, is that Mr. Trump has hired inexperienced loyalists to fill senior roles in the Justice Department even as hundreds of career prosecutors have departed either by their own choice or because they were forced out for having worked on cases that ran afoul of the president.
Junior prosecutors typically attend a weeklong course on the ins and outs of working with grand juries, and often trail more seasoned colleagues before they take the lead in presenting cases. But leaders in politically appointed posts do not get the same kind or amount of training.....
But over the past year or so, there has been a flurry of no true bills in federal courts across the country. Most have occurred in cities like Los Angeles and Washington, where grand jurors have rejected several cases involving people accused of protesting the administrations immigration crackdowns and surges in federal law enforcement.
Other high-profile failures have involved grand juries hearing cases against Mr. Trumps political foes among them, Letitia James, New Yorks attorney general, and the six Democratic lawmakers who posted a video reminding military and intelligence personnel of their obligation to disobey illegal orders.
This is a great article on the issues being raised about trump's attempts to subvert the grand jury process. Grand juries serve an important role and trump's DOJ is resorting to fraud to get true bills.