Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(81,301 posts)
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 11:30 AM 12 hrs ago

Katie Phang Sues DOJ Over Alleged Violations of Epstein Files Transparency Law

Source: meidasnews.com


A major test will be standing.

Aaron Parnas 45 minutes ago


Journalist and legal analyst Katie Phang has filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice, accusing it of failing to comply with a landmark transparency law requiring the release of records related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his network.

The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, names Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche as the defendant and alleges “brazen” violations of the 2025 Epstein Files Transparency Act, a statute intended to force the public release of government-held materials tied to Epstein and his associates.

..............

Phang’s complaint alleges a pattern of misconduct by the DOJ, including:

Missing statutory deadlines for document production
Improper or excessive redactions
Failure to explain redactions as required by law
Withholding or retracting key documents after release






Read more: https://meidasnews.com/news/katie-phang-sues-doj-over-alleged-violations-of-epstein-files-transparency-law



It is PAST time someone did this.





The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, names Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche as the defendant and alleges “brazen” violations of the 2025 Epstein Files Transparency Act,


https://meidasnews.com/news/katie-phang-sues-doj-over-alleged-violations-of-epstein-files-transparency-law
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Katie Phang Sues DOJ Over Alleged Violations of Epstein Files Transparency Law (Original Post) riversedge 12 hrs ago OP
What is the punishment if they still refuse to release all files? Fla Dem 12 hrs ago #1
But she is Whip-poor-will 12 hrs ago #4
You think there are literal rape tapes, and Biden's DoJ just sat on them and didn't pursue anyone appearing in them? AZJonnie 11 hrs ago #6
The victims have said, repeatedly that their names were published while questionseverything 11 hrs ago #7
Can you show me an instance of one of them saying the name of a rich man who raped them personally was redacted? AZJonnie 11 hrs ago #9
Team Bondi & Blanch seem to have been instrumental in this particular protection racket Attilatheblond 9 hrs ago #18
President Biden was not involved in the day-to-day decisions of then AG Garland. Justice matters. 11 hrs ago #8
And I don't think AG Garland would've just sat on videos that proved a child was raped AZJonnie 11 hrs ago #10
Not sure of that. Garland waited two years before seriously looking at the insurrectionist-in-chief's Justice matters. 10 hrs ago #13
That's not what I recall re: when Trump's role in Jan 6. began to be looked at by Garland's DoJ AZJonnie 10 hrs ago #16
We all saw the felon's speech and INCITEMENT live or on streaming... Justice matters. 8 hrs ago #21
Video of the Jan 6th public speech would never have been enough to make federal charges stick AZJonnie 7 hrs ago #23
There's a lot of years between Epstein's first Florida conviction questionseverything 8 hrs ago #20
If I'm not mistaken, there was a long investigation ongoing Justice matters. 8 hrs ago #22
But how EuterpeThelo 12 hrs ago #2
Rape tapes are coming Whip-poor-will 12 hrs ago #3
They would be very seriously breaking the law if they did this AZJonnie 10 hrs ago #12
That's right Whip-poor-will 10 hrs ago #14
S/he stole copies of illegal child-porn videos from FBI evidence? AZJonnie 10 hrs ago #15
Bravo Katie! DemocracyForever 12 hrs ago #5
I am saddened to say......... popsdenver 10 hrs ago #11
Sometimes you just have to do the right thing....win or lose. democrank 10 hrs ago #17
👍 Figarosmom 9 hrs ago #19

Fla Dem

(27,713 posts)
1. What is the punishment if they still refuse to release all files?
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 11:38 AM
12 hrs ago

Does someone actually get imprisoned and for how long?
Are individuals fined / imprisoned or are agencies fined (taxpayers money)for ignoring a judicial order?

Good on Katie Phang, but if the regulatory punishment is mediocre at best, I don't think it'll have much of an effect.

Hope I'm wrong, I'm certainly not a legal scholar.

Whip-poor-will

(396 posts)
4. But she is
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 11:56 AM
12 hrs ago

Katie Phang is a licensed attorney, trial lawyer, and former prosecutor in Florida.,I'm betting this goes somewhere.

Those rape tapes must be some vile disgusting action.

AZJonnie

(3,883 posts)
6. You think there are literal rape tapes, and Biden's DoJ just sat on them and didn't pursue anyone appearing in them?
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 12:22 PM
11 hrs ago

Am I correct in assuming you think there's other men in the alleged videos besides Epstein?

And they neither did anything to bring those men to justice, and didn't include any of the tapes in their 2022 case against Maxwell?

I don't

questionseverything

(11,876 posts)
7. The victims have said, repeatedly that their names were published while
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 12:57 PM
11 hrs ago

The rich men’s names that raped and assaulted them have been redacted.

The justice department has been ignoring and downplaying Epstein crimes since his first state conviction


AZJonnie

(3,883 posts)
9. Can you show me an instance of one of them saying the name of a rich man who raped them personally was redacted?
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 01:04 PM
11 hrs ago

I mean I know what you're talking about generally with their names being exposed, but not the names of men, but I've not seen any of them explicitly say the name of someone who raped them was redacted. That would be a pretty big development I don't think I'd have missed

In any case, the topic at hand is the existence of "rape videos". I don't think Garland's DoJ would've just sat on such things. Apparently you do, that's your right. I disagree. I don't think they would've, or did

Justice matters.

(9,955 posts)
8. President Biden was not involved in the day-to-day decisions of then AG Garland.
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 12:58 PM
11 hrs ago

He was respectful of the DoJ "independence" from the Oval Office, a "tradition" the pedophile broke without consequences yet.

On edit: The DoJ did not interfere into the Maxwell trial by releasing anything, as required to not get her case dismissed.

AZJonnie

(3,883 posts)
10. And I don't think AG Garland would've just sat on videos that proved a child was raped
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 01:10 PM
11 hrs ago

and showed the man doing it. Maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part, but I've seen no evidence that such videos exist, nor that such a thing happened (Garland DoJ coverup). I also wouldn't think that NONE of the people who worked on the case, but have since been fired (Maureen Comey comes to mind) would say anything publicly if they knew of the existence of said videos.

Justice matters.

(9,955 posts)
13. Not sure of that. Garland waited two years before seriously looking at the insurrectionist-in-chief's
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 01:23 PM
10 hrs ago

criminal role in the criminal attempt to overthrow the 2020 election...

That's what happens when justice is delayed.

Republicrooks know how to protect themselves. Brazil did not wait a minute.

AZJonnie

(3,883 posts)
16. That's not what I recall re: when Trump's role in Jan 6. began to be looked at by Garland's DoJ
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 01:49 PM
10 hrs ago

But in any case, an actual video is the gold standard of evidence. If a video of Trump literally directing the insurrection had been available, I don't think Garland's DoJ would've dragged their feet.

Maybe my faith is misplaced, but I just don't think Garland's FBI had videos of old rich guys raping the minors in Epstein's orbit, or Garland's DoJ would have pursued those men criminally. Nobody from the FBI has ever confirmed such videos exist (though they've said Epstein had child porn generally, they never said he was in them, or the girls he knew were in them). I'd think someone (perhaps who was fired by Bondi) would've come out by now and said "yeah, they do exist, I've unfortunately seen them myself" or that sort of thing.

To be clear, the lack of videos doesn't prove such offenses didn't happen, it just means there's not a super-easy way to prosecute people over the crimes. Bottom-line I don't think there's enough evidence (i.e. what we currently know), to presuppose that there ARE such videos. At best I think it's a maybe. MHO, fwiw

Justice matters.

(9,955 posts)
21. We all saw the felon's speech and INCITEMENT live or on streaming...
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 03:20 PM
8 hrs ago

Really? Go to the Capitol and fight like hell or you won't have a country anymore... on freaking full 65 million colors...

AZJonnie

(3,883 posts)
23. Video of the Jan 6th public speech would never have been enough to make federal charges stick
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 04:57 PM
7 hrs ago

What he did from the podium is not categorically unlawful enough to successfully prosecute a POTUS for what happened afterwards.

What Biden's DoJ needed was proof there was a preconceived plot to attack the Capital, and then proof that Trump was actively involved in the planning thereof. So the type of video I mean is he's talking to the head of the Oath Keepers and telling them "here's what you do" and it was "take violent actions". Also, I don't think you're correct that nothing was done for 2 years, so I reject the premise.

I'm just telling you, friend, I think it's more likely there are NOT videos of rich old (other) men molesting the minor girls in Epstein's orbit than it's likely there ARE, and I outlined (well, some of) the reasons I've reached that conclusion

I guess, perhaps time will prove me wrong (but it cannot ever prove me right because that involves proving a negative). I accept that risk, like I say I'm simply saying my best guess. And because that is my best guess, when someone presupposes that they MUST exist, I'll sometimes push back, because there is an inherent implication by such assertions that Biden's DoJ was totally corrupt. Not just foot-dragging, but outright corrupt. And in a REALLY horrible way.

Justice matters.

(9,955 posts)
22. If I'm not mistaken, there was a long investigation ongoing
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 03:28 PM
8 hrs ago
during President Biden's term.

Contrary to the current disgusting felon, he respected the norm of not interferring into an ongoing investigation.

On edit: AND if there are such tapes, I doubt he was even informed of their existence, let alone actually saw them.

His "mistake" (we all make some) was to select Garland (the defender of Republicrooks) as USAG (in my opinion).

EuterpeThelo

(413 posts)
2. But how
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 11:44 AM
12 hrs ago

does she have standing to bring the suit? I mean, we ALL should have standing, really. But IIRC, one of the issues with the EFTA is that there was no enforcement mechanism baked into it.

Whip-poor-will

(396 posts)
3. Rape tapes are coming
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 11:50 AM
12 hrs ago

Roll the Tapes

There has to be a FBI agent who handled and grabbed a copy of the child porn flicks.

Time to find your Danial Ellsburg in you and dump the tapes and therefore trump.

Our imagination will be tested when the tapes come out about how vile and depraved one human can be being to a child.

AZJonnie

(3,883 posts)
12. They would be very seriously breaking the law if they did this
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 01:22 PM
10 hrs ago

"There has to be a FBI agent who handled and grabbed a copy of the child porn flicks".

Think about what you're saying.

AZJonnie

(3,883 posts)
15. S/he stole copies of illegal child-porn videos from FBI evidence?
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 01:30 PM
10 hrs ago

Which are illegal to possess in anything but the strictest of circumstances?

This theoretical agent could've gone to jail not just for stealing evidence, but for POSSESSION OF KIDDIE PORN.

If these videos exist, I seriously doubt any "agent" has "copies" they personally, secretly requisitioned. No matter how good their intentions may've been for doing so, it's a serious, serious criminal risk you're talking about.

popsdenver

(2,461 posts)
11. I am saddened to say.........
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 01:14 PM
10 hrs ago

She, like so many others, are pissing in the Ocean and expecting it to change color, or pissing upwind.....LOL

The DOJ, the FBI, etc. as well as the Republican Senators, Republican House Members, a large segment of the Appellate Courts, as well as the Republican Supreme Court......are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Republican 2025 group.......

This didn't just inadvertently "happen"......they have been organizing and orchestrating this for over 46+ years........inching forward step by step. They are finally at a stage where they are now "galloping".........

While The Nation Slept.........

Here we are folks, in MAY of a Major election year, and STILL without a Dem Party Leader, and not having much of any kind of plan..........

democrank

(12,654 posts)
17. Sometimes you just have to do the right thing....win or lose.
Mon Apr 27, 2026, 02:03 PM
10 hrs ago

No man is abound the law, right? Right?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Katie Phang Sues DOJ Over...