Appeals court clears way for U.S. to reopen border for asylum seekers
Source: Washington Post
A federal appeals court ruled Friday that President Donald Trump's declaration of an "invasion" at the U.S.-Mexico border was illegal, effectively clearing the way to reopen the United States to migrants seeking asylum.
It was not clear when asylum processing would resume, and the Trump administration is likely to appeal the decision. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump issued the proclamation, "Guaranteeing the States Protection Against Invasion," on the first day of his second term, barring entry to asylum seekers for public safety, health and economic reasons "until I issue a finding that the invasion at the southern border has ceased." Since then, Border Patrol apprehensions have fallen to the lowest levels in decades after spiking to record highs under the Biden administration.....
"We conclude that the INA's text, structure, and history make clear that in supplying power to suspend entry by Presidential proclamation, Congress did not intend to grant the Executive the expansive removal authority it asserts," the opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said.....
"The court's opinion does not mean there are now open borders, but only that the United States will no longer be one of the few countries in the world who after World War II does not provide a hearing for those fleeing persecution," said Lee Gelernt, the American Civil Liberties Union attorney who argued the appeal. "The court properly made clear that the president cannot simply waive away the laws enacted by Congress."
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2026/04/24/court-border-asylum-trump
Link to tweet
BumRushDaShow
(170,963 posts)Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/28071721/refugees.pdf
Biden, 45, Obama judges
REFERENCES
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143386698
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143388010
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143489770
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143506182
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143558540
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143566928
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143566928
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143638114
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143641199
LetMyPeopleVote
(180,856 posts)BumRushDaShow
(170,963 posts)This appeal was heard back in November 2025, with the case originally filed in February 2025, and lower court ruling in July 2025!
LetMyPeopleVote
(180,856 posts)Only congress has this power. I am also surprised that it took 15 months to get this ruling
Link to tweet

LetMyPeopleVote
(180,856 posts)trump issued an executive order that banned asylum without congressional approval. It took 15 months but a divided court struck down this executive order
Link to tweet

https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/24/politics/trump-migrant-claiming-asylum-rejected-appeals-court
The 2-1 decision is a major defeat for a signature component of Trumps immigration agenda. Administration officials repeatedly cited a proclamation the president issued on his first day back in office that sought to end asylum by any means when touting a sharp decline in unlawful crossings along the Southern border.
But the DC Circuit Court of Appeals said that proclamation and the federal rules stemming from it ignored laws Congress enacted, including the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Barring foreign individuals who are physically present in the United States from applying for asylum and, if they make the statutory showing that they are eligible, from being considered to receive it cannot be squared with the statute, wrote Judge Michelle Childs, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, in the decision. She was joined by Judge Nina Pillard, a Barack Obama appointee.
riversedge
(81,234 posts)Appeals court rules that Trump's asylum ban at the border is illegal
Story by MICHAEL KUNZELMAN and LINDSAY WHITEHURST 7h
................
Advocates welcome the ruling
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said that previous legal action had already paused the asylum ban, and the ruling wont change much on the ground.
The ruling, however, represents another legal defeat for a centerpiece policy of the president.
This confirms that President Trump cannot on his own bar people from seeking asylum, that it is Congress that has mandated that asylum seekers have a right to apply for asylum and the President cannot simply invoke his authority to sustain, said Reichlin-Melnick.
Advocates say the right to request asylum is enshrined in the countrys immigration law and say denying migrants that right puts people fleeing war or persecution in grave danger....................