Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(170,963 posts)
Fri Apr 24, 2026, 03:41 AM 21 hrs ago

10th Circuit orders second look at challenge to Colorado 'ghost gun' law

Source: Colorado Politics

04/23/2026 | updated 12 hours ago


The Denver-based federal appeals court issued a mixed decision on Thursday, finding that a group of plaintiffs could not challenge certain aspects of Colorado’s “ghost gun” prohibition, could challenge others, and ordered further analysis of the law’s constitutionality.

To address the proliferation of guns privately assembled from kits or 3-D printers, the General Assembly enacted Senate Bill 279 three years ago, making it a misdemeanor to possess certain firearm components not imprinted with a serial number. There is an exception when the owner obtains a serial number from a licensed firearm dealer and the dealer performs a background check. Multiple violations of the law are felony offenses.

After a collection of gun rights groups and individual plaintiffs failed to receive a preliminary injunction, they turned to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. In an April 23 opinion, a three-judge panel addressed the law’s manufacturing prohibition, the possession component, and the purchasing component.

All three judges agreed that the prohibition on manufacturing a firearm frame or receiver did not apply to what the plaintiffs wanted to do — assemble parts that were already manufactured. The law “limits the prohibition to making frames or receivers from raw material — not the completing, assembling, or converting a previously manufactured and unfinished frame into a finished one,” wrote Judge Joel M. Carson III in concluding the plaintiffs could not challenge the manufacturing component.

Read more: https://www.coloradopolitics.com/2026/04/23/10th-circuit-orders-second-look-at-challenge-to-colorado-ghost-gun-law/



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010111422830.pdf
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
10th Circuit orders second look at challenge to Colorado 'ghost gun' law (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 21 hrs ago OP
The whole point of a "ghost gun" Miguelito Loveless 14 hrs ago #1
I'm a bit surprised that the gun lobby doesn't come out aginst thest "ghost guns" .... groundloop 14 hrs ago #2
Isn't it funny that the NRA doesn't come out against the tyranny and treason travelingthrulife 14 hrs ago #4
We have no right to protect ourselves from the Holy Gun. travelingthrulife 14 hrs ago #3

Miguelito Loveless

(5,821 posts)
1. The whole point of a "ghost gun"
Fri Apr 24, 2026, 09:45 AM
14 hrs ago

is to enable illegal acts and lower the chances of them being traced to the user.

groundloop

(13,897 posts)
2. I'm a bit surprised that the gun lobby doesn't come out aginst thest "ghost guns" ....
Fri Apr 24, 2026, 09:59 AM
14 hrs ago

because they're obviously going to cut into gun manufacturer profits at some point. And it's been pretty obvious for a good many years that the NRA and other gun organizations put the profits of gun makers above all else, including the lives of our children.

travelingthrulife

(5,412 posts)
4. Isn't it funny that the NRA doesn't come out against the tyranny and treason
Fri Apr 24, 2026, 10:10 AM
14 hrs ago

we are experiencing every day. They said it was their whole reason for being.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»10th Circuit orders secon...