Trump polled advisers about replacing Tulsi Gabbard as intelligence chief
Source: The Guardian
Thu 2 Apr 2026 06.00 EDT
Last modified on Thu 2 Apr 2026 06.01 EDT
Donald Trump has privately asked cabinet officials in recent weeks whether he should replace his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, venting frustration that she shielded a former deputy who undercut his rationale for war with Iran, according to two people briefed on the discussions.
It is not clear that Trump will actually fire Gabbard over the episode. Currently, there is no standout candidate to take the job, and advisers have cautioned that creating a high-profile vacancy before a successor is ready could cause unhelpful political distractions.
But Trump's discussions marks an ominous development for Gabbard, given the president tends to poll his advisers when he starts to seriously consider whether a personnel change is necessary. The two people spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.
Trump's doubts about Gabbard followed her testimony at the world wide threats hearing on Capitol Hill last month where she declined to condemn Joe Kent, who had resigned days earlier after arguing that Iran did not pose an imminent threat to the United States, the people said. The nature of Kent's departure and his criticism of the war had already angered Trump, but he expressed particular frustration about Gabbard seemingly defending Kent and appearing reluctant to defend the administration's position to attack Iran, the people said.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/02/trump-tulsi-gabbard-intelligence-chief
The (expected) purge of women begins.
TALLY (can be added to)
Noem - check
Bondi - getting there
Gabbard - getting there
McMahon - (in a Department that is being dismantled)
Lake - self-destructing
Pirro - definitely on the list
Habba - possible
Leavitt - reasons are starting to accumulate
sop
(18,649 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,169 posts)I thought he knew everything.
ananda
(35,165 posts)and needs people to take the blame if needed.
Lovie777
(23,001 posts)Hmmmmm
Psycho men like Hegseth, Miller, Rubio, etc
.
not so much.
Javaman
(65,723 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,841 posts)and then clear the rest out eventually. She's probably the most high profile losingest faux-prosecutor on his loser team.
Ray Bruns
(6,376 posts)
progree
(12,985 posts)Kid Berwyn
(24,426 posts)
FakeNoose
(41,666 posts)What's up with that? Aren't any men going to be fired .. or maybe they're all just perfect?
Talitha
(7,996 posts)City Lights
(25,841 posts)it won't make much of a difference. The problem is with him.
thesquanderer
(13,010 posts)From his first term, see...
Rex Tillerson
HR McMaster
Jeff Sessions
John Bolton
Reince Priebus
Mark Esper
James Comey
John Kelly
Mick Mulvaney
Anthony Scaramucci
As it happens, I don't think he fired any high profile women? Though a number of them left... Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Nikki Haley, Hope Hicks, Kellyanne Conway... and Betsy DeVos and Elaine Chao resigned after Jan 6.
So far this term he hasn't been as quick to replace high profile people (or they may be "relocated" rather than outright dismissed), but besides Noem, I guess there's Mike Waltz and Greg Bovino. That's all I can think of, anyway.