Federal Prosecutor Used Fabricated Quotes in Court Filing (2)
Source: Bloomberg Law
Federal Prosecutor Used Fabricated Quotes in Court Filing (2)
March 6, 2026, 4:55 PM EST; Updated: March 6, 2026, 9:08 PM EST
Ben Penn
Senior Reporter
Email Ben Penn
Tweet Ben Penn

Justice Department lawyers in North Carolina are facing possible sanctions for what a magistrate judge called "fabricated quotations and misstatements of case holdings."
Photographer: MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images
An assistant US attorney in North Carolina filed a response with the court that included "fabricated quotations and misstatements of case holdings" and then made "false or misleading statements" of how they got included, a magistrate judge said.
"Because of the seriousness of these issues," senior leaders from the US Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina must appear at a show cause hearing next week for why the federal prosecutor responsible shouldn't be sanctioned and why the entire office shouldn't be held jointly responsible, US Magistrate Judge Robert Numbers said in a March 2 order. ... The US attorney's office is representing the Defense Department in a lawsuit by a North Carolina pro se litigant challenging a policy limiting availability of GLP-1 weight loss medications for TRICARE for Life participants.
The plaintiff asserted that a response brief signed by assistant US attorney Rudy Renfer included fabricated quotes and misstated the holdings of several cases. In a reply, Renfer said he "inadvertently included incorrect citations to case law from this circuit" and attributed the errors to the "inadvertent filing of an unfinalized draft document," Numbers said in his order.
{snip}
The pro se plaintiff who caught the errors, Derence Fivehouse, is a retired Air Force colonel and an attorney himself. He's a former staff judge advocate (1) who also served as chief of the legal counsel division (2) at the Air Force Base Conversion Agency in the George W. Bush administration ... In an email to Bloomberg Law Friday night, Fivehouse credited the court for identifying "the most significant issues" after he flagged "a few case misrepresentations."
{snip}
The case is Fivehouse v. Defense Dept., E.D.N.C., No. 2:25-cv-00041. (3)
(Updated with comment from plaintiff.)
To contact the reporter on this story: Ben Penn in Washington at bpenn@bloomberglaw.com
To contact the editors: Seth Stern in Washington at sstern@bloomberglaw.com
(1) https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA281364.pdf
(2) https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CDIR-2002-10-01/pdf/CDIR-2002-10-01-DEPARTMENTS-3.pdf
(3) https://www.bloomberglaw.com/product/blaw/document/X1Q6OSEMSL82?criteria_id=b64c7b3d6a191c07d4e465a2d29c366e&searchGuid=30d7d168-a18d-472b-9323-9326354ec987
Read more: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/federal-prosecutor-used-fabricated-quotes-false-cites-in-filing
I am editing this story as I go along, so replies might raise issues that were addressed in an edit made after the reply was posted.
The skeet misidentified the pro se litigant as the defendant. He is the plaintiff.
Hat tip, Ken White
Reposted by Special Envoy for the Shield of the Popehats
https://bsky.app/profile/kenwhite.bsky.social
NEWS: A Justice Dept. line attorney in North Carolina fabricated quotes in court filing, causing judge to order hearing to consider sanctions and holding entire US attorneyâs office jointly responsible.
— Ben Penn (@benjaminpenn.bsky.social) 2026-03-06T22:50:39.106Z
Pro se defendant flagged the errors.
news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/...
*******
Ben Penn
@benjaminpenn.bsky.social
NEWS: A Justice Dept. line attorney in North Carolina fabricated quotes in court filing, causing judge to order hearing to consider sanctions and holding entire US attorney's office jointly responsible.
Pro se defendant flagged the errors.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/federal-prosecutor-used-fabricated-quotes-false-cites-in-filing
Federal Prosecutor Used Fabricated Quotes in Court Filing
An assistant US attorney in North Carolina filed a response with the court that included "fabricated quotations and misstatements of case holdings" and then made "false or misleading statements" of ho...
news.bloomberglaw.com
5:50 PM · Mar 6, 2026
*******
pnwmom
(110,241 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(27,446 posts)The pro se plaintiff who caught the errors, Derence Fivehouse, is a retired Air Force colonel and an attorney himself. He's a former staff judge advocate who also served as chief of the legal counsel division at the Air Force Base Conversion Agency in the George W. Bush administration
mahatmakanejeeves
(69,201 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 7, 2026, 04:21 AM - Edit history (1)
to add the info that the plaintiff is himself an attorney.
I am posting from an Amazon Fire, so articles get posted in dribs and drabs.
And good morning.
pnwmom
(110,241 posts)Those cover pages don't show a person's resume, so I bet the govt. lawyers didn't spot the name of a lawyer who'd served in W's administration.
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
wcmagumba This message was self-deleted by its author.
mahatmakanejeeves
(69,201 posts)Published on:
Mar. 3, 2026
An assistant U.S. attorney in North Carolina, Rudy Renfer, filed a court response containing fabricated quotations and misstatements of case holdings and then made false or misleading statements about how they were included, a federal court found according to a Bloomberg article.
Because of the seriousness of these issues, senior leaders from the Eastern District of North Carolinas U.S. Attorneys Office must appear at a show cause hearing to explain why Renfer shouldnt be sanctioned and why the office shouldnt be held jointly responsible, the court said.
Having reviewed the filings in this matter and other submissions by Renfer, the court has serious concerns about the accuracy of certain quotations and representations in Renfers filings and the explanation offered for their inclusion, the court said.
The court identified several fabricated quotes and misstatements of multiple circuit court opinions, as well as two fabricated quotes from the Code of Federal Regulations.
The case is Fivehouse v. Defense Dept., No. 2:25-cv-00041 (E.D.N.C.).
barbtries
(31,284 posts)North Carolina, this state where i live, where republicans rule.
so, they're catapulting the propaganda into the Court.
wolfie001
(7,518 posts)pfitz59
(12,596 posts)what's left are third tier MAGA zealots
highplainsdem
(61,453 posts)every detail of every result is always stupid), which Bloomberg mentioned. The stupid and apparently AI-using attorney hasn't yet confirmed that AI was used, but has been asked about it.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/federal-prosecutor-used-fabricated-quotes-false-cites-in-filing
cbabe
(6,546 posts)citizenry who cant discern ai slop from the real.
A lawyer I know is already seeing this. If you dont know whats correct then you cant review for it.
Like the kids who dont know where east and west are. They just look at their phones for where to go.
highplainsdem
(61,453 posts)could be counted on for accuracy and real intelligence.
But since it can never be depended on - can always be hallucinating/fabricating results - people are surrendering their own ability to think to idiot machines.
Martin68
(27,523 posts)population will have a better understanding of the weaknesses in AI and better able to discern its effects. If enough lawyers have their reputations ruined by the careless use of AI, successful lawyers will learn how to use AI more judiciously and with better oversight.
cbabe
(6,546 posts)Martin68
(27,523 posts)the strengths and weaknesses of of AI as we learn more about both. We used to conduce atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons until we became aware of the effects that could have on the health of the population. There is a learning curve.
Old Crank
(6,879 posts)At work again.
Oooo we sent in the wrong filing. Sorry about that.
Courts have been catching the DOJ s lawyers in all sorts of fraudulent filings and statements. The lawyers will get a very short leash if the judge doesn't remove them entirely.
This is why Bondi wants to have say over state bars.
Martin68
(27,523 posts)Renew Deal
(84,924 posts)Because it's pretty unlikely that "fabricated quotes" would be sourced some other way