Democrats' internal review said to find Kamala Harris's stance on Gaza cost her votes in 2024
Source: The Times of Israel
Live Now Updated 45min ago
Democrats internal review said to find Kamala Harriss stance on Gaza cost her votes in 2024
DNC reportedly showed findings to pro-Palestinian group despite saying it would not make probe public
By ToI Staff
Today, 3:35 am
Read more: https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog-february-23-2026/
No body of story yet.
This is top (newest) story on The Times of Israel liveblog.
no paywall
usonian
(24,378 posts)Damage done.
Gaza was destroyed thanks to the abstainers.
And America is being destroyed, as well.
STOP ICE. STOP TRUMP, STOP VANCE, THIEL AND MUSK. STOP MIKEY.
Do it or there's nothing left.
Celerity
(54,015 posts)An internal investigation within the US Democratic Party has found that former US vice president Kamala Harriss stance on Gaza and Israels war against Hamas cost her votes in the 2024 election, the Axios news outlet reports.
According to Axios, this information was uncovered by the Democratic National Committee amid its probe into the errors and pitfalls that led to Harris losing against US President Donald Trump. The DNC said last year it would not make its findings public.
Nevertheless, Axios says members of the DNC informed pro-Palestinian activists from the IMEU Policy Project that their data showed Harriss stance on Israel and Gaza which was in line with the policies of former US president Joe Biden was overall a net negative in the election.
Axios says it had independently verified that the DNC believes Harriss policies on Israel and Gaza did alienate some voters. The DNC confirms to Axios that it did indeed speak to the IMEU Policy Project but declines to provide details on the meeting.
snip
groundloop
(13,688 posts)thesquanderer
(12,937 posts)the short campaign window
hewing so closely to a Biden legacy that many had already grown skeptical about (which I guess includes OP's reference to stance on Gaza)
not being a great campaigner/communicator (e.g. for much of the campaign, she avoided interviews and press conferences, and often didn't do so great when she didn't)
and okay, she was a woman and a person of color, though I think that factor is often overstated on DU... because the "I won't vote for a woman" or "I won't vote for a POC" voters are, I believe, overwhelmingly people who would almost certainly vote for a Republican over a Democrat anyway.
travelingthrulife
(4,960 posts)So sick of people trashing a very good candidate.
Shrek
(4,408 posts)In the first month or so after entering the race she had a substantial bounce in the polls and there was a palpable sense of joy and relief among the electorate. Trump and Vance were constantly on the defensive with all the mockery about being "weird" and the online couch ridicule, while Harris/Walz rallies were raucous and enthusiastic. Had the election been held in early August I believe she'd have won comfortably.
After that she steadily lost ground and there's nothing to suggest that a longer campaign would have resulted in a turnaround.
Response to PufPuf23 (Original post)
Omaha Steve This message was self-deleted by its author.
Prairie Gates
(7,658 posts)in the West Bank and Gaza is not just criminal, but fundamentally evil.
You can pretend that it is simple antisemitism all you want, but it is a fact. That includes big portions of the US population. And not just the activists. A lot of people have held their tongue and watched what was happening, and said nothing but silently stewed about what the IDF was and is doing in Gaza.
yardwork
(69,146 posts)/sarcasm
Prairie Gates
(7,658 posts)That's for sure. And the Harris campaign absolutely made the calculation that they could ignore those people and those sentiments far more easily than they could ignore AIPAC. And here we are.
yardwork
(69,146 posts)Are you a member of her team?
Look, I agree that the DNC is dominated by old white dudes who are still using outmoded, unsuccessful campaign strategies and messaging. I agree that that approach doesn't serve us well. We need an overhaul of Democratic campaign strategies.
But this idea that Harris deliberately alienated voters by calling for a reasonable approach to the decades-long mess in the Middle East is bullshit.
Voters had a clear choice between pure evil and "not perfect but sincerely working on a solution" and they chose evil.
I will never forget or forgive.
Mz Pip
(28,411 posts)This is a fine example of of the perfect being the enemy of the good.