Moderna says FDA refuses its application for new mRNA flu vaccine
Source: Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is refusing to consider Modernas application for a new flu vaccine made with Nobel Prize-winning mRNA technology, the company announced Tuesday.
...
Moderna received whats called a refusal-to-file letter from the FDA that objected to how it conducted a 40,000-person clinical trial comparing its new vaccine to one of the standard flu shots used today. That trial concluded the new vaccine was somewhat more effective in adults 50 and older than that standard shot.
The letter from FDA vaccine director Dr. Vinay Prasad said the agency doesnt consider the application to contain an adequate and well-controlled trial because it didnt compare the new shot to the best-available standard of care in the United States at the time of the study. Prasads letter pointed to some advice FDA officials gave Moderna in 2024, under the Biden administration, which Moderna didnt follow.
According to Moderna, that feedback said it was acceptable to use the standard-dose flu shot the company had chosen but that another brand specifically recommended for seniors would be preferred for anyone 65 and older in the study. Still, Moderna said, the FDA did agree to let the study proceed as originally planned.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/moderna-vaccine-flu-mrna-2fc551cb2fb45735e67db0a4e2e2b0fb
As science writer Tom Levenson points out:
That would be to shadow ban vaccine research as a prelude to barring US access to as many vaccines as possible. To refuse to evaluate a vaccine application is to shut down years and millions of dollars of research. No one in the for profit drug business is going to put their resources into such work. Why should they?
And this move, if left to stand, will have a similar chilling effect on not-for-profit research. Grants wont flow and researchers would have less and less incentive to stake their careers on work that might go nowhere. Not because of any scientific shortfall, but because anti-vaccine cultists have decided theyd rather hold power than save lives.
...
What to do? Im not sure, but calling your senators and representative and screaming in rage cant hurt.
https://balloon-juice.com/2026/02/10/those-fkers/
rampartd
(4,295 posts)the first person that rfk can claim was sickened by a vaccine will sue, with rfk's backing" and win a bundle.
Puppyjive
(956 posts)They have no expertise anymore. The wheels have fallen off the bus.
BadgerKid
(4,971 posts)and you can look up drug therapies that have gotten EU approval but not US approval.
sinkingfeeling
(57,499 posts)3Hotdogs
(15,166 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(105,866 posts)See the last 2 paragraphs excerpted in the OP. Nowhere in the article does "directives" appear.
It's important not to give in to bad faith arguments by the Trump regime by misreading them and assuming they are being reasonable.
Wonder Why
(6,676 posts)Javaman
(65,436 posts)NNadir
(37,581 posts)...in a multitude of capacities.
While we are all suspicious of the brain worm guy and his dangerously illiterate contempt for vaccines, the announcement is typical of many similar announcements over many decades.
All clinical trials compare the standard of care. Many fail on this basis. Some fail based on risk/reward basis. I may have reservations about some rejections; I disagreed with the decision in the 1990s to not approve Omapatrlat, which may have addressed a population, largely African American who did not respond to blood pressure drugs, but I fully recognize that the drug, which cost billions of dollars to develop, had very real risks of death to a subpopulation. (This was during the Clinton administration. ) To be clear, there are a large number of scientists at FDA who are vastly smarter than I am.
I certainly support the development of vaccines, and I am thrilled with the science connected with RNA based approaches. However few people here are qualified to stand in judgement of clinical trial approvals.
This is not an unusual event and the assumption it is political is probably without basis.
popsdenver
(1,900 posts)are definitely informative, and well stated........
However, any one wishing to have their business approved, including Big Pharma, must acknowledge the fact that doing anything without the pre-requisite kneeling down, kissing the ring, and putting a shitload of cash in Trump's personal pocket, is going to fail dramatically......A Fact That Has Been Shown To Be The Case On Countless Occasions........
SpankMe
(3,679 posts)The technology allows faster development, better targeting of desired pathogens, better safety than conventional vaccines and a whole list of other benefits. mRNA vaccines cannot cause DNA damage as anti-vax crazies believe.
RFK Jr. cancelled all US mRNA research in the first weeks of his tenure. This assures that the US will fall behind in life-saving medical technology.
PSPS
(15,270 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(177,018 posts)While the Trump administration focuses on a deworming medication as a possible cancer cure, its taking a different approach to a potential flu vaccine.
FDAâs refusal to review Moderna flu vaccine generates immediate political backlash While the Trump administration focuses on a deworming medication as a possible cancer cure, itâs taking a diff...
— Cancer-Vaccine (@cancer-vaccine.activitypub.awakari.com.ap.brid.gy) 2026-02-11T14:55:00.000Z
#Maddowblog #Politics
Origin | Interest | Match
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/fdas-refusal-to-review-moderna-flu-vaccine-generates-immediate-political-backlash
Ordinarily, the FDA wouldnt have to remind people that theyre not livestock, but it became necessary for an unfortunate reason: An alarming number of people were trying to treat Covid-19 by voluntarily taking a medicine known as ivermectin, which is generally a deworming medication intended for horses and cows.....
Making matters spectacularly worse, while the Trump administration takes seriously the idea that a livestock deworming medication might cure cancer, the same administration is taking a very different approach to a potential vaccine for influenza. The New York Times reported:
The vaccine maker Moderna said on Tuesday that the Food and Drug Administration had notified the company that the agency would not review its mRNA flu vaccine, the latest sign of federal health policy that has become hostile to vaccine development.
Dr. Vinay Prasad, the agencys top vaccine regulator, rejected the companys application for approval over a concern that Modernas clinical trial had compared its experimental vaccine against a product the agency did not consider the best on the market. People in the comparison group received Fluarix Quadrivalent, a flu vaccine sold by GSK.
The Times report added that Moderna had spent years and hundreds of millions of dollars testing its flu vaccine. Evidently, the Trump administration doesnt care.....
Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington wrote online on Tuesday night that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is now blocking an updated flu vaccine for no reason grounded in science. American vaccine policy has been hijacked by a conspiracy theorist yet most Republicans are happy to just sit on their hands. They are allowing FDA policy to be dictated by DELUSION.
Murray, in a message directed at Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who chairs the Senates Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, added, If I were the Chair of the Senate HELP Committee, I would have moved to subpoena RFK Jr. a LONG time ago, but the next best time is NOW. [Cassidy], what happened to those quarterly oversight hearings? You and I both know its well past time for Congress to step in.
Cassidy has not yet responded. Watch this space
Initech
(108,073 posts)He deserves life in prison as much as the rest in this horrid administration.
The Wizard
(13,637 posts)They want to cut off health care from seniors on Social Security. Trump is the western Pol Pot.
