Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(163,412 posts)
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 12:14 PM 7 hrs ago

Judge scolds Justice Department for 'profound investigative missteps' in Comey case

Source: AP

Updated 12:00 PM EST, November 17, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department engaged in a “disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps” when it secured an indictment against former FBI Director James Comey, a federal judge ruled Monday in directing prosecutors to produce to defense lawyers all grand jury materials from the case.

Those problems, wrote Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick, include “fundamental misstatements of the law” by a prosecutor to a grand jury that indicted Comey in September, the use of potentially privileged communications in the investigation and unexplained irregularities in the transcript of the grand jury proceedings.

“The Court recognizes that the relief sought by the defense is rarely granted,” Fitzpatrick wrote “However, the record points to a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent and a prosecutor to potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding.”

The 24-page opinion is the most blistering assessment yet by a judge of a criminal case against Comey that is already subject to multiple other challenges, including motions seeking its dismissal on the grounds that the interim U.S. attorney who filed the charges, Lindsey Halligan, was illegally appointed and that the prosecution itself constitutes a vindictive prosecution.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/comey-halligan-justice-department-d663148e16d042087210d4d266ea10ae



Link to RULING (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.582136/gov.uscourts.vaed.582136.191.0.pdf
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge scolds Justice Department for 'profound investigative missteps' in Comey case (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 7 hrs ago OP
Toss it out, Your Honor! lastlib 7 hrs ago #1
Worse actual Fraud IbogaProject 5 hrs ago #4
Democracy Docket-Judge Sees 'Profound Investigative Missteps' in Trump's Comey Prosecution LetMyPeopleVote 7 hrs ago #2
Who knew, by following the Felon's instructions Buddyzbuddy 7 hrs ago #3
Thanks for including.... reACTIONary 4 hrs ago #5
No problem! BumRushDaShow 3 hrs ago #6
Law and Crime is a real mixed bag.... reACTIONary 2 hrs ago #8
Probably because they actually have a TV (streaming I think) show BumRushDaShow 1 hr ago #9
Deadline Legal Blog-Judge cites 'disturbing pattern' in ordering disclosure of James Comey grand jury materials LetMyPeopleVote 3 hrs ago #7

lastlib

(27,150 posts)
1. Toss it out, Your Honor!
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 12:19 PM
7 hrs ago

"selective and vindictive prosecution"; prosecutorial misconduct; Illegally appointed (and unqualified) prosecutor; ignorant tyrannical president--you have plenty of grounds to toss it!

IbogaProject

(5,430 posts)
4. Worse actual Fraud
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 02:35 PM
5 hrs ago

There were Two Signed Grand Jury Documents, which isn't possible unless one was forged or the US DOJ pushed for a second vote or they just forged the second one.

LetMyPeopleVote

(172,742 posts)
2. Democracy Docket-Judge Sees 'Profound Investigative Missteps' in Trump's Comey Prosecution
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 12:30 PM
7 hrs ago

Halligan does not know criminal law and made some major unforced errors with this grand jury



https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/judge-doj-turn-over-grand-jury-materials-james-comey/

A federal judge ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to give former FBI Director James Comey all materials it presented to a grand jury to secure a two-count indictment against him in September.

The order marks a significant blow to the DOJ’s case against Comey, which is part of President Donald Trump’s wider effort to wield the department against his longtime perceived enemies.

In his ruling Monday, Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick said his review of the materials revealed “substantive irregularities” that may arise to “misconduct” on the part of the DOJ. These concerns, the judge said, warrant disclosure of grand jury materials to Comey — a move that almost never happens in criminal proceedings.

The Court recognizes that the relief sought by the defense is rarely granted,” Fitzpatrick wrote. “However, the record points to a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent and a prosecutor to potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding.”

“Here, the procedural and substantive irregularities that occurred before the grand jury, and the manner in which evidence presented to the grand jury was collected and used, may rise to the level of government misconduct resulting in prejudice to Mr. Comey,” the judge added.

Buddyzbuddy

(1,923 posts)
3. Who knew, by following the Felon's instructions
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 12:30 PM
7 hrs ago

Halligan and Bondi would be exposed for the corrupt morons they are. After all, he knows more than everybody about everything. Republican=lemming.

reACTIONary

(6,857 posts)
5. Thanks for including....
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:45 PM
4 hrs ago

... the link to the ruling itself. I like looking at the rulings and it sometimes takes a bit of effort to find them.

BumRushDaShow

(163,412 posts)
6. No problem!
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:59 PM
3 hrs ago

AP rarely puts any links to court filings/rulings (and they didn't in this case), so I go digging elsewhere. This is why you see me use "Law & Crime" a lot because despite their somewhat wacky long headlines, they are still a "legal-focused" site and will include links to the court filings about 90+% of the time.

reACTIONary

(6,857 posts)
8. Law and Crime is a real mixed bag....
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 05:40 PM
2 hrs ago

.... When focused on Law they do real good; when focused on Crime, they do
real crime sensationalism.

BumRushDaShow

(163,412 posts)
9. Probably because they actually have a TV (streaming I think) show
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 06:20 PM
1 hr ago

so they do the "True Crime" stuff (as their "bread and butter" programming).

LetMyPeopleVote

(172,742 posts)
7. Deadline Legal Blog-Judge cites 'disturbing pattern' in ordering disclosure of James Comey grand jury materials
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 04:24 PM
3 hrs ago

A judge noted “profound investigative missteps” that could “undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding” against the former FBI director.

Judge cites ‘disturbing pattern’ in ordering disclosure of James Comey grand jury materials - MS NOW

apple.news/AGVBkZuUESjm...

(@oc88.bsky.social) 2025-11-17T19:13:34.156Z

https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/james-comey-grand-jury-disclosure-judge-trump-rcna244397

A remarkable ruling in James Comey’s case shows yet another way that the prosecution against the former FBI director could unravel — separate from the pending questions of whether Lindsey Halligan was lawfully appointed and whether the case she brought is unconstitutionally vindictive.

Ordering the rare disclosure of grand jury materials to the defense, U.S. Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick concluded that the record in the case “points to a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent and a prosecutor to potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding.”

Fitzpatrick’s 24-page opinion on Monday paints a damning picture on several fronts of the effort overseen by Halligan, the Trump-installed prosecutor who hadn’t previously prosecuted a case and brought this one over the objection of career prosecutors.

After reviewing the grand jury materials himself, Fitzpatrick wrote that Halligan appeared to make two “fundamental misstatements of the law that could compromise the integrity of the grand jury process.” The specific statements are redacted in the opinion, but the judge noted that they gave grand jurors the wrong impression about Comey’s legal rights......

Though the ruling doesn’t dismiss the case, it represents the latest serious cause for concern for Halligan — if, in fact, she wants this case to get to trial, where it would face its own problems of proving the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge scolds Justice Depa...