Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ForgoTheConsequence

(5,137 posts)
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 10:22 AM Yesterday

Jeffries stalls effort to restore federal workers' bargaining rights

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Lasher (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Politico

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ staff on Wednesday night blocked an effort to sidestep Speaker Mike Johnson and force a vote on a bipartisan bill that would restore collective bargaining rights for thousands of federal workers, according to four people granted anonymity to describe the sensitive matter.


House leadership has stalled on scheduling a vote for the “Protect America’s Workforce Act” since it was introduced in April. Lawmakers have introduced a discharge petition that would allow the bill to immediately get a floor vote if 218 people sign on.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/13/hakeem-jeffries-federal-workers-union-rights-bill-00650491

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeffries stalls effort to restore federal workers' bargaining rights (Original Post) ForgoTheConsequence Yesterday OP
From the article, here's the long game. markodochartaigh Yesterday #1
Allowing him to claim credit as a pro union Republican. BOSSHOG Yesterday #6
I'm slow, I don't understand. gab13by13 Yesterday #2
I don't get it either. Autumn Yesterday #4
I think there must be more to this. Asshole republican Lawler is doing what they have always done Autumn Yesterday #3
So we blocked a bill that we would ordinarily support to keep a GOPer from being 218. I'm sorry, but that's some BS Silent Type Yesterday #5
When you put it like that it sounds kind of petty. Autumn Yesterday #7
Locking. Lasher 23 hrs ago #8

markodochartaigh

(4,651 posts)
1. From the article, here's the long game.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 10:32 AM
Yesterday

Two of the people, who were granted anonymity to share private details, said Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) was poised to sign on if Grijalva did — a move that would have given the petition the numbers needed to advance. But Democrats privately argue that Lawler only wants to attach his name to the effort if he can be the 218th and decisive supporter, allowing him to claim credit as a pro-union Republican.

A spokesperson for Jeffries, Christie Stephenson, said Democrats intend to force a vote on the bill in the coming weeks.

“If Congressman Lawler was as concerned about these working people as he apparently is about his own reelection, he would have signed the discharge petition last night, or any time in the over 160 days since it launched,” Stephenson said. “We also look forward to him signing on as a co-sponsor of the historically bipartisan Protecting the Right to Organize Act given his sincere concern for collective bargaining rights in this country.”

BOSSHOG

(44,164 posts)
6. Allowing him to claim credit as a pro union Republican.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 11:11 AM
Yesterday

Mike Lawlers stand up comedy routine. Next he’ll be denouncing those who have sex with eight year olds because that’s just wrong.

gab13by13

(30,695 posts)
2. I'm slow, I don't understand.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 10:40 AM
Yesterday

Who gives a shit who #218 is? The #10 person to sign is just as important as the 218th.

Autumn

(48,662 posts)
4. I don't get it either.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 10:41 AM
Yesterday

Autumn

(48,662 posts)
3. I think there must be more to this. Asshole republican Lawler is doing what they have always done
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 10:41 AM
Yesterday

Trying to make himself look good for re election.

Silent Type

(12,025 posts)
5. So we blocked a bill that we would ordinarily support to keep a GOPer from being 218. I'm sorry, but that's some BS
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 11:00 AM
Yesterday

partisanship.

If it's a good bill, vote for it.

Autumn

(48,662 posts)
7. When you put it like that it sounds kind of petty.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 11:41 AM
Yesterday

Lasher

(29,288 posts)
8. Locking.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 12:27 PM
23 hrs ago

The linked article was published on 11/13/2025. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jeffries stalls effort to...